Teams

RAFAEL RC 55MX7.0A

2024 MIXED 55&Over · 55&Over MX7.0

24 players · average NTRP 3.31 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 55&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alyson Aiello
published 4
3.65
Jennifer Rice
published
3.62
Kat Thornton
published
3.52
Stewart Clark
published
3.37
Chris Beard
published 3.5
3.36
Petra Jacobson
published
3.33
Madhur Dayal
published
3.31
Roland Davantes
published
3.28
Steven Walker
published
3.23
Kevin Scheer
published
3.22
Cheryl Clark
published 3.5
3.18
Susan Ginwala
published
3.15
Sarah Fonkalsrud
published
3.04
Ted Hayden
published
3.00
Ashley Roden
published 3.5
2.90
Irene Denebeim
published 3
2.88
Suzanne Gogna
published
2.80
Brenda Leerar
published 3
2.64
Cesare Cecchin
published 3
2.62
Craig Thigpen
published 3
Jonathan Freudman
published
Phil Neal
published
Shana Pierre
published
Teresa Shaw
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Clark + Stewart Clark224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alyson Aiello
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Rice
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.65
Kat Thornton
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.62
Stewart Clark
13W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Chris Beard
13W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.37
Petra Jacobson
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%14%
3.36
Madhur Dayal
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.33
Roland Davantes
15W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.31
Steven Walker
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.28
Kevin Scheer
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Cheryl Clark
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.22
Susan Ginwala
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
Sarah Fonkalsrud
9W–12L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.15
Ted Hayden
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Ashley Roden
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Irene Denebeim
7W–5L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
Suzanne Gogna
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
2.88
3
Brenda Leerar
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Cesare Cecchin
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%<1%
2.64
3
Craig Thigpen
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
2.62
Jonathan Freudman
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Phil Neal
10W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Shana Pierre
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Teresa Shaw
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.