Teams

Douglas-Brown/Knoxville

2025 Adult 40 & Over-Knoxville · 4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-25vs Eagen-Morgan/KnoxvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesPaige Brown / Tori Hayes vs Sheri Kilbey / Natalie Harrison4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesErin Upshaw vs Pamela Shirley7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Oakley / Laura Warrick vs Wesley Fuller / Shantel Houston6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCarol Edmunds / Whitney Liner vs Gina O'Neil / Shawni Eaker3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#4 DoublesCarrie Hayes / Emily Jenkins vs Lori Barrett / Jodie Campbell2-6, 3-6
2025-04-18vs Webb/KnoxvilleSplit 22
L#1 DoublesPaige Brown / Carol Edmunds vs Allison Counselman / Julie Bankston7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesErin Upshaw vs Renee Sprouse4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEve Tang / Carrie Hayes vs Amber Davis / Lawrie Treakle6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesEmily Jenkins / Tori Hayes vs Ginny Davis / Susan Bishofberger7-5, 6-1
2025-04-11vs Fields/KnoxvilleLost 05
L#1 DoublesWhitney Liner / Eve Tang vs Melissa Kirby / Liz Mcclain0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesChristina Sheringham vs Lauren Hall0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Campbell / Maggie Whitt vs Kelly Barger / Holly Tucker-Vance6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCarol Edmunds / Erin Upshaw vs Lea Ann Fields / Jennifer Johnson3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#4 DoublesLaura Warrick / Emily Jenkins vs Kelly Simpson / Terryann Nelson6-7, 2-6
2025-04-04vs Huffman/KnoxvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesTori Hayes / Carol Edmunds vs Jennifer Bell / Rebecca Jones0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesErin Upshaw vs Maja Lugonjic6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJennifer Campbell / Christina Sheringham vs Patsy Fischer / Donna French7-6, 6-3
2025-03-28vs Benton/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesEve Tang / Carrie Hayes vs Jasmine Dabbs / Lori Thompson5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesErin Upshaw / Tori Hayes vs Dena Teague / Margot Dunn4-6, 0-6
W#4 DoublesMaggie Whitt / Laura Warrick vs Lynn Johnson / Linda Rankin6-3, 6-4
2025-03-14vs Eagen-Morgan/KnoxvilleWon 50
W#1 DoublesCarrie Hayes / Tori Hayes vs Paige Troutman / Michele Hall Craig7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesErin Upshaw vs Natalie Deel6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPaige Brown / Carol Edmunds vs Gina O'Neil / Wesley Fuller6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChristina Sheringham / Julie Burnette Kirkpatrick vs Ida Randall / Pamela Shirley6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#4 DoublesLaura Warrick / Jennifer Oakley vs Lori Barrett / Michelle Hull6-1, 7-6
2025-03-07vs Webb/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 SinglesChristina Sheringham vs Abigail Jumper6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCarrie Hayes / Tori Hayes vs Vallie Collins / Lawrie Treakle6-3, 6-4
L#4 DoublesJulie Burnette Kirkpatrick / Laura Warrick vs Amber Davis / Julie Bankston2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Whitney Liner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.78
Erin Upshaw
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.65
Carol Edmunds
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.65
Maggie Whitt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Tori Hayes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.59
Carrie Hayes
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.52
Eve Tang
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.46
Julie Burnette Kirkpatrick
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Christina Sheringham
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.27
Laura Warrick
usually #4 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 46% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tori Hayes + Carrie Hayes3541% games−14.9% vs expected
Carrie Hayes + Erin Upshaw0541% gamesnot enough data
Christina Sheringham + Julie Burnette Kirkpatrick303 matchesnot enough data
Tori Hayes + Erin Upshaw033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Whitney Liner
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Erin Upshaw
29W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Carol Edmunds
3W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.65
Maggie Whitt
12W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Tori Hayes
11W–22L career · 6 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
4
Carrie Hayes
13W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
Eve Tang
5W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
Julie Burnette Kirkpatrick
20W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Christina Sheringham
13W–7L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.28
Laura Warrick
32W–32L career · 11 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.