Teams

Strickler

2026 Howard Adult 55 & Over · Howard Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-06-13vs Munshell - IHT 55 7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesPeter Kim / Hubert Bowditch vs Leonid Leznik / James Forbes2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJamie Strickler / Richard Briggs vs Robert Fox / Steven Wolf2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Eckhaus / Peter Hong vs Jeffrey Santos / Tony Adson3-6, 2-6
2026-06-09vs Firestone - Firemen '26Lost 12
L#1 DoublesHubert Bowditch / Douglas Lee vs Xavier Ona / George Sybert2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPeter Hong / Yancy Dennis vs James DeMasi / Krish Narasimhan3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRichard Briggs / Richard Safeer vs Benjamin Grismore / Srihari Vemulakonda6-0, 6-2
2026-06-08vs Munshell - IHT 55 7.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesPeter Kim / Jamie Strickler vs Robert Fox / Larry Wall2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Ritchey / Richard Safeer vs DONALD CRAWLEY / Michael Litzau1-6, 3-6
2026-06-02vs McKeon - DefendersWon 21
W#1 DoublesPeter Hong / Hubert Bowditch vs Adam Drucker / Michael Maiorana5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Eckhaus / Richard Safeer vs Seung Kim / John Batu2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKevin Ro / Yancy Dennis vs Kevin Rothstein / Juan Rivas7-5, 0-6, 1-0
2026-05-30vs DT Grabill 7.0 55+Split 11
W#1 DoublesJeffery Bishoff / Douglas Lee vs Joe Gatto / Michael Hansberry7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Eckhaus / Peter Hong vs Murty Challa / MIKHAIL MAKSIMENKO2-6, 3-6
2026-05-16vs Firestone - Firemen '26Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJeffery Bishoff / Guy Silas vs Gerald Jones / George Sybert6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPeter Kim / Jamie Strickler vs Daniel Laczko / Krish Narasimhan6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRichard Briggs / William Ritchey vs Jim Firestone / Bill Kenney4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-05-14vs DT Grabill 7.0 55+Split 11
L#2 DoublesWilliam Ritchey / Yancy Dennis vs Vince Giuliana / Vin Grabill1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRichard Safeer / Jeffery Bishoff vs Jeffrey Anderson / Daniel Mandl6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-05-03vs McKeon - DefendersLost 12
L#1 DoublesHubert Bowditch / Jeffery Bishoff vs Jim Hannan / John Batu6-7, 4-5
W#2 DoublesWilliam Ritchey / Douglas Lee vs Richard McKeon / Jim Leveque6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKevin Ro / Michael Eckhaus vs Kevin Rothstein / Majed Hamawy3-6, 2-6
2026-04-19vs Munshell - IHT 55 7.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDouglas Lee / Jeffery Bishoff vs Tony Adson / Kevin Hill4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Ritchey / Guy Silas vs Matt Baumann / John Deleonibus2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRichard Briggs / Jamie Strickler vs Tim Munshell / Jeffrey Santos6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2026-04-12vs Firestone - Firemen '26Won 21
L#1 DoublesGuy Silas / Hubert Bowditch vs Bruce Knolmayer / Stephen Murray3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRichard Briggs / Peter Hong vs Jim Firestone / James DeMasi4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Eckhaus / Richard Safeer vs Stephen Rawlings / Andrey Savtchenko6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Howard Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Munshell - IHT 55 7.01002737157
2Firestone - Firemen '2655131737290
3DT Grabill 7.0 55+3792145285
4Strickler28102045315

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Richard Safeer
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.17
Jamie Strickler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.17
Richard Briggs
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.13
Peter Hong
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.11
Jeffery Bishoff
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.10
William Ritchey
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.85
Kevin Ro
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Douglas Lee
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Guy Silas
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Hubert Bowditch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Eckhaus
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Yancy Dennis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Richard Safeer
3W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Jamie Strickler
5W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
Richard Briggs
7W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
Peter Hong
9W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Jeffery Bishoff
50W–95L career · 5 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
William Ritchey
6W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
Kevin Ro
18W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
Douglas Lee
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Guy Silas
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Hubert Bowditch
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Eckhaus
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Yancy Dennis
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.