Teams

MLVWE/Westport

2022 40 & Over Mixed Doubles · Mixed 8.0 Tues pm 40s

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-02vs MLJPatterson/CSD OverlookLost 01
L#1 DoublesEdward Levy / Lori Helms vs Jack Horowitz / Cindy Houser6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2022-07-12vs MLPAte/NMPSplit 11
L#1 DoublesScott Darden / Becky Heflin vs Michelle Potuzak / Bill Parrish7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHelen Bugg / Edward Bugg vs Kevin Hash / Stefanie Flippin6-1, 6-1
2022-07-05vs MLTWA-Waber-PEN MxdWon 10
W#2 DoublesHelen Bugg / Scott Darden vs Karen Ray / Mike McMahon6-1, 6-3
2022-06-28vs MLLAltamura/PeninsulaWon 20
W#2 DoublesHelen Bugg / John Weber vs Ronald Bruce / Lori Scherrman3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEdward Levy / Brenda Levy vs Maryann Bruce / Thomas Larson7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-14vs MLBKU/PAC 40+Split 11
L#1 DoublesBecky Heflin / Scott Darden vs Miguel Pando / Cheryl Robinson6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesHelen Bugg / Edward Bugg vs Tom McElhenny / Kelly Kennard7-5, 6-2
2022-06-07vs M-LSSR-Sree/NMP/2240+Split 11
L#1 DoublesBecky Heflin / Scott Darden vs Stacie Kennington / Arnaud Couturier4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesHelen Bugg / Edward Bugg vs Amy Brandon / Nate Roller6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 8.0 Tues pm 40s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Brenda Levy
published 4.5
3.80
Becky Heflin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Chip Ashley
published 4
3.52
Helen Bugg
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.49
Edward Bugg
published 4
3.42
John Weber
published
3.07
Vicki Weber
published
3.07
Edward Levy
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Shaun Simmer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Helen Bugg + Chip Ashley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brenda Levy
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
4.07
4
Becky Heflin
324W–99L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Chip Ashley
127W–132L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Helen Bugg
164W–86L career · 5 lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.52
4
Edward Bugg
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.49
John Weber
18W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.42
Vicki Weber
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Edward Levy
139W–135L career · 4 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
Shaun Simmer
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.