Teams

E3 MTC 8.0 Downing

2024 Richmond Adult 55 & Over Weeknight Women · Richmond Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Weeknight Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.12 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-15vs G6 ACAC Stallard - GiancasproWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeannie Langnau / Joy Lareau vs Andrea Schuetzinger / Robin Petrine6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJanice McGarity / Erin Euen vs Ella Johnson / Kimberly Giancaspro6-3, 6-1
2024-08-01vs Mid-Atlantic/Kampinga/55&Over8.0WWon 10
W#3 DoublesErin Euen / Janice McGarity vs Robin Booth / Mary Davis7-6, 2-1
2024-07-31vs C4 Belmont - ColginLost 01
L#1 DoublesCindy Eramian / Joy Lareau vs Silvia Sykes / Jane Taft6-0, 2-6, 0-1
2024-07-25vs F5 CCV BartzenSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJanice McGarity / Gale Tune vs Melissa Mauck / Nancy Young4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJoy Lareau / Susan Nothnagle vs Margaret Corwin / Jennifer Bencks6-3, 6-2
2024-06-20vs Mid-Atlantic/Kampinga/55&Over8.0WWon 10
W#2 DoublesCindy Eramian / Joy Lareau vs Nancy Row / Theresa Hughes6-3, 6-2
2024-06-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesNancy Pitts / Joy Lareau vs Elizabeth Moore / Katherine Hill6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Weeknight Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Janice McGarity
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.83
Nancy Pitts
published
3.77
Cindy Eramian
published 4
3.74
Joy Lareau
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.55
Diana Duddy
published 4
3.48
Jeannie Langnau
published
3.34
Erin Euen
published
3.32
Laurie Miller
published
Hanna Mogilnicka
published
Marilyn Downing
published
Maureen McGrath
published
Susan Nothnagle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joy Lareau + Nancy Pitts9164% games−2.4% vs expected
Maureen McGrath + Cindy Eramian5060% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Janice McGarity
70W–56L career · 3 lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
3.96
Nancy Pitts
15W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Cindy Eramian
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.77
4
Joy Lareau
84W–99L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Diana Duddy
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.55
Jeannie Langnau
12W–21L career · no lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
3.48
Erin Euen
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
3.34
Laurie Miller
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
91%9%<1%
3.32
Hanna Mogilnicka
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marilyn Downing
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Maureen McGrath
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Nothnagle
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.