Teams

Seminole Lake Ramdeen

2022 Pinellas Mixed 18 & Over Spring · 8.0 MXD Sunday

11 players · average NTRP 3.94 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-12vs ELW OrrWon 10
W#3 DoublesMiguel Angel Goni Rodrigo / Lara Slatniske vs Joey Patti / Gillian Irving6-3, 6-1
2022-06-05vs McMullen FramersWon 21
W#1 DoublesLara Slatniske / Miguel Angel Goni Rodrigo vs James Plunkett / Cambria Whalen6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesIrene Nasworthy / Mark Nasworthy vs Lisa Oonk / Brandon Halm7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Palmer / Dori Hazama vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-01vs PINELLAS - Tarpon/KronkLost 01
L#1 DoublesMiguel Angel Goni Rodrigo / Dori Hazama vs Jose Jarabo / Marcy Faircloth4-6, 6-7
2022-04-24vs Safety Harbor PasinskiLost 01
L#2 DoublesMark Nasworthy / Lara Slatniske vs Eduardo Guizar / Kayla Dyer2-6, 6-7
2022-04-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMark Nasworthy / Dori Hazama vs Jeff Huser / Angelica Barrera4-6, 1-6
2022-04-04Won 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Palmer / Lara Slatniske vs Anant Tamirisa / Erica Lamar6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 MXD Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Asbel Giang
published 4.5
3.90
David Palmer
published 4
3.89
Brian Hodapp
published 4
3.85
Lara Slatniske
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.78
Irene Nasworthy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Allison Guerra
published 4
3.61
Karen Abrams
published
3.26
Mark Nasworthy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Dori Hazama
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
JoAnn Lind
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Nasworthy + Irene Nasworthy171059% gamesnot enough data
Dori Hazama + Mark Nasworthy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Asbel Giang
7W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
David Palmer
16W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Brian Hodapp
12W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Lara Slatniske
130W–79L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Irene Nasworthy
186W–103L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Allison Guerra
10W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.75
Karen Abrams
9W–12L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.61
3.5
Mark Nasworthy
114W–79L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Dori Hazama
199W–167L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
JoAnn Lind
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Miguel Angel Goni Rodrigo
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.