Teams

KC-RH TEAL

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-16vs SS-H ORANGEWon 31
W#1 DoublesKelly Fisher / Briana Epp vs Stacie Sonius / Blair Weber5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHeather Larson vs Farrah Johnson3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJanet Weyhmiller / Christie Hughes vs Erica Giesen / Catherine Zeberlein6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Crease / Kirsten Washer vs Dorothy Carr / Susan OBrien7-5, 6-2
2026-07-09vs SS-LGT REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesKelly Fisher / Nancy Crease vs Jennifer Jackson / Christina Schwartz6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJulie Hobart vs Cassie George6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAlyssa Elmore / Christie Hughes vs Elizabeth Freestone / Sherri Partlow6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMelissa Miller / Kirsten Washer vs Toni Chalmers / Lisa Stark1-6, 2-6
2026-07-02vs LEBTC NAVYWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlyssa Elmore / Melissa Miller vs Shelby Striegel / Claire Uman6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBriana Epp / Julie Hobart vs Kathleen Samuelli / Michelle Davis6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesChristie Hughes / Janet Weyhmiller vs Claudia Swanson / Gretchen Burr6-4, 6-4
2026-06-25vs LTFC BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesKelly Fisher / Melissa Miller vs Meg Braun / Svetlana Kolesnikova7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJulie Hobart vs Jennifer Ramsey6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAlyssa Elmore / Janet Weyhmiller vs Laura Fry / Juliana Daugherty7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBriana Epp / Nancy Crease vs Lynn Price / Karen Wendling7-5, 6-3
2026-06-18vs HRCA-N BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesKelly Fisher / Nancy Crease vs Shannon Porter / Adele Rhinehart6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJulie Hobart vs Amy Tharp6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAlyssa Elmore / Christie Hughes vs Julie Johns / Melinda Shaffer6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesHeather Larson / Lauren Plain vs Joyce Naylon / Cinda Nab6-2, 6-2
2026-06-11vs PH REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKelly Fisher / Melissa Miller vs Kristine Kuettel / Carole Buyers4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHeather Larson vs Margo Livadariu2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKirsten Washer / Diane Pickett vs Christina Quigley / Lori Silliman7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLauren Plain / Christie Hughes vs Gina Maestas / Kathleen Kenny Davia6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-06-04vs KC-CC BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesDiane Pickett / Alyssa Elmore vs Mary Ann Cabot / Beth Beers6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJulie Hobart vs Phuong Banh6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMelissa Miller / Briana Epp vs Anita Kinder / Kerry Anders6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJanet Weyhmiller / Lauren Plain vs Michelle Windemuller / Sarah Ward6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Diane Pickett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.46
Julie Hobart
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.43
Alyssa Elmore
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.43
Christie Hughes
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.30
Nancy Crease
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Kirsten Washer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Lauren Plain
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Kelly Fisher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Heather Larson
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Briana Epp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Janet Weyhmiller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Plain + Christie Hughes5167% games+8.7% vs expected
Briana Epp + Nancy Crease271357% games+5.7% vs expected
Janet Weyhmiller + Christie Hughes5159% games+5.7% vs expected
Janet Weyhmiller + Lauren Plain20555% games+0.8% vs expected
Janet Weyhmiller + Alyssa Elmore9260% games+0.7% vs expected
Briana Epp + Christie Hughes2351% games−2.1% vs expected
Janet Weyhmiller + Briana Epp2343% games−11.5% vs expected
Janet Weyhmiller + Nancy Crease5163% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Diane Pickett
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
Julie Hobart
30W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%61%38%
3.46
3.5
Alyssa Elmore
72W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.43
3.5
Christie Hughes
28W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Nancy Crease
116W–53L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Kirsten Washer
67W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Lauren Plain
89W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Kelly Fisher
32W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Heather Larson
12W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Briana Epp
81W–78L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Janet Weyhmiller
71W–65L career · 4 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.