Teams

UPTA18A/McCullough/Kroc

2024 Fall 18 & Over-Women-UPTA · 3.5 Women FF

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-15vs UPTA18F/McGrath/ThornbladeLost 23
L#1 DoublesGina Hungerford / Anne Flink vs Keri McGrath / Patricia Gailey4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesDevin Mequio vs Brantley Goforth2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTricia Socash / Lisa Maurides vs Kelly Wheeler / Carlin Turner6-4, 7-5
W#2 SinglesAli Hollstegge vs Jill Seeley6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMartha Gower / Elizabeth McDonough vs Erica Kelly / Laura Garrett4-6, 5-7
2024-11-08vs Pratt/RiverwalkLost 23
L#1 DoublesElizabeth McDonough / Marci Howle vs Haley Reynolds / Stacey Thomas4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesDevin Mequio vs Hope Davis6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTinsley Hallman / Ali Hollstegge vs Claudia Kornaros / Van Nguyen6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesAnne Flink vs Bethany Pratt2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKerry Plum / Heather Gunter vs Lora Henderson / Holli Mayher6-2, 6-3
2024-11-01vs UPTA18/Cree/SouthsideWon 31
W#1 DoublesLauren McCullough / Tricia Socash vs Alexandra Mendoza / Emily Allen6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesGina Hungerford vs Andrea Scoggins6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLisa Maurides / Kerry Plum vs Emily Gunderson / Rachel Duncan7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKatie Jones / Ali Hollstegge vs Dorothy Farmer / Kerri Hughes6-1, 6-2
2024-10-18vs UPTA18/McNeel/Sugar CreekLost 23
L#1 DoublesMartha Gower / Marci Howle vs Jill Curran / Laura McNeel5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesTinsley Hallman vs Taylor Campbell3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKatie Jones / Lisa Maurides vs Jennifer Nessmith / Sharon Payne2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesGina Hungerford vs Kim Barrs6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMerle Dunson / Heather Gunter vs Julie Stewart / Austin Clay0-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-10-11vs HWY 14 - FOSTERLost 04
L#1 DoublesMarci Howle / Tinsley Hallman vs Leslie Waltz / Whitney McGregor3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAnne Flink vs Mimi Reid0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth McDonough / Martha Gower vs Beth Ouellette / Jennifer Street3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesTricia Socash / Ali Hollstegge vs Jane Krason / Keeli Waller4-6, 4-6
2024-10-04vs UPTA18/Ellison/GCCWon 41
W#1 DoublesKatie Jones / Tricia Socash vs Amanda Jones / Nancy Theodore6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesGina Hungerford vs Shely Landrum6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLauren McCullough / Martha Gower vs Kate Gilreath / Ann Ellison6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesTinsley Hallman vs Joanna Bragdon6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesDevin Mequio / Merle Dunson vs Deana Blanding / Suzanne Massey Schemm6-4, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women FF have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Gina Hungerford
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.50
Ali Hollstegge
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.48
Tinsley Hallman
usually #2 Singles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.40
Tricia Socash
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.20
Devin Mequio
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Marci Howle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Elizabeth McDonough
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.98
Gay Dupree
published
2.94
Merle Dunson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Lauren McCullough
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.88
Lisa Maurides
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Martha Gower
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.69
Anne Flink
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Kerry Plum
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Maurides + Martha Gower3637% games−6.4% vs expected
Tinsley Hallman + Ali Hollstegge404 matchesnot enough data
Merle Dunson + Gay Dupree123 matchesnot enough data
Merle Dunson + Elizabeth McDonough123 matchesnot enough data
Tricia Socash + Lisa Maurides303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gina Hungerford
30W–6L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.52
3.5
Ali Hollstegge
16W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.50
Tinsley Hallman
14W–6L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.48
Tricia Socash
27W–7L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%76%23%
3.40
3.5
Devin Mequio
9W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
Marci Howle
12W–17L career · 3 lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
3.11
Elizabeth McDonough
7W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.08
Gay Dupree
10W–17L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.98
Merle Dunson
21W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
2.94
Lauren McCullough
3W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
2.91
Lisa Maurides
9W–22L career · 3 lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
2.88
Martha Gower
9W–21L career · 4 lines in 2024
85%15%<1%
2.85
3
Anne Flink
8W–30L career · 3 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
Kerry Plum
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.