Teams

OC Irvine Heritage Park - Leslie - Sun9

2024 USTA Adult 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WE - 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.44 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 SinglesJill Jobran vs Patricia Santiago2-6, 3-6
2024-06-15vs OC Team Courage - LPC - Nisha Sat1Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJill Jobran vs Daniela Schardinger5-7, 3-6
2024-06-01Won 10
W#1 SinglesJill Jobran vs SAE JUNG LEE6-0, 6-0
2024-05-19Won 10
W#2 SinglesJill Jobran vs Leah Jablon6-2, 6-3
2024-05-05vs OC CMTC - Susie Kim - Sat10Won 10
W#1 SinglesJill Jobran vs Veronika Zherdeva6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Cassie Hadfield
published 3.5
3.57
Dianne Tanger
published 3.5
3.54
Jill Jobran
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.47
Nicole Festini
published
3.34
Candi Maher
published 3.5
3.27
Sherrie Hadlich
published 3.5
3.20
Cecilia Mai
published 3.5
3.18
Kim Quaglierini
published
3.13
Christina Case
published 3.5
3.13
Sandra Patel
published
3.10
Xuan Le
published
3.09
Leslie Le
published
2.97
Vivian Noble
published
2.93
Deborah Eskenazi
published 3
2.78
Emma Sivilay
published
Maria des Dorides
published
Mariana Chan
published
Trang Phan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christina Case + Sandra Patel61144% games+1.8% vs expected
Deborah Eskenazi + Emma Sivilay123 matchesnot enough data
Xuan Le + Kim Quaglierini213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cassie Hadfield
62W–31L career · no lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.58
3.5
Dianne Tanger
47W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%32%68%
3.57
3.5
Jill Jobran
171W–46L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.54
Nicole Festini
22W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.47
3.5
Candi Maher
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Sherrie Hadlich
71W–63L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Cecilia Mai
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
Kim Quaglierini
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Christina Case
11W–26L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
Sandra Patel
13W–26L career · no lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.13
Xuan Le
32W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%25%75%
3.10
Leslie Le
22W–37L career · no lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
3.09
Vivian Noble
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Deborah Eskenazi
5W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
2.93
Emma Sivilay
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
Maria des Dorides
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mariana Chan
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Trang Phan
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.