Teams

Gartman - Biloxi

2025 Singles League 18 & Over-GC · Women 2.5

5 players · average NTRP / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
2025-12-15vs Blevins TOCCSplit 11
L#1 SinglesSarah Craddock vs Caitlyn Chapman Akers6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesRobyn Johnson vs Shari Newman6-1, 6-2
2025-12-08vs St. Martin-MathewsWon 10
W#1 SinglesRobyn Johnson vs Heather Wagner6-3, 6-3
2025-11-18vs SRYC - DiSantiWon 20
W#1 SinglesSarah Craddock vs Stephanie Chapman6-4, 6-3
W#3 SinglesJanet Blythe vs Tracey Mathews6-0, 6-1
2025-11-17vs BBTC - MatthewsWon 10
W#1 SinglesSarah Craddock vs Elan Buckley6-0, 6-0
2025-11-13vs SRYC - DiSantiWon 20
W#1 SinglesSarah Craddock vs Lauren Purvis6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 SinglesRobyn Johnson vs Katy Boyer6-0, 6-4
2025-11-11vs Mitchell TOCCWon 20
W#1 SinglesSarah Craddock vs Holly French6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesRobyn Johnson vs Katherine Swetman5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-11-04vs BBTC - MatthewsWon 20
W#1 SinglesJanet Blythe vs Ann Strange6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesRebecca Atchison vs Jordan Herrington6-1, 6-2
2025-10-29vs BBTC Matthews SinglesWon 10
W#2 SinglesSarah Craddock vs Brianna Beesley4-6, 1-2
2025-10-28vs SRYC - DiSantiWon 20
W#1 SinglesRobyn Johnson vs Lacey Paquin6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJanet Blythe vs Tracy Jackson-Wilson7-6, 7-5
2025-10-27vs Diamondhead-PowellWon 10
W#2 SinglesSarah Craddock vs Christina Milner6-2, 6-2
2025-10-21vs Mitchell TOCCWon 20
W#1 SinglesSarah Craddock vs Holly French6-2, 6-4
W#3 SinglesRebecca Atchison vs Billie Macnaughton4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-10-21vs OSTC - VoLost 01
L#3 SinglesMelissa Gartman vs Meagan Baskin1-6, 0-6
2025-10-14vs Mitchell TOCCSplit 11
W#1 SinglesSarah Craddock vs Tara Mitchell6-0, 6-0
L#3 SinglesRebecca Atchison vs Katherine Swetman0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Sarah Craddock
usually #1 Singles 78%, also #2 Singles 22% · published
2.56
Robyn Johnson
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.46
Rebecca Atchison
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.39
Janet Blythe
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Melissa Gartman
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Blythe + Melissa Gartman8356% games−6.6% vs expected
Melissa Gartman + Rebecca Atchison3270% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Craddock
35W–29L career · 9 lines in 2025
0%2%98%
2.77
Robyn Johnson
49W–48L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%32%68%
2.56
Rebecca Atchison
21W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.46
Janet Blythe
29W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%81%19%
2.39
Melissa Gartman
30W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.