Teams

Austin-Serve It Up

2025 18 & Over Little State · Ladies 3.5 Flight

14 players · average NTRP 3.42 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-08-17vs Mission-Tennis GalsLost 23
W#1 DoublesMarni Christmas / Andrea Pikoff vs Angelica Olivas / Gabriela Almanza6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKeegan Kennedy vs Martha Houghton2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAlison Segura / Carmela Gillenwater vs Rose Hamdan / Anna Lee Salinas3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesSharon Chesnutt vs Alexa Nunez0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesPenny Arnold / Carey Olson vs Teresa Hemer / DORILMA COVA6-1, 6-3
2025-08-16vs NOHO-Lucky StringsWon 32
W#1 DoublesLee Warth / Christine Muzy vs Jennifer Guillory / Wendy Liddell5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAndrea Pikoff vs Kristi Pickett6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAlison Segura / Jessica Lesh vs Polly Hunt / Kimberlee Combs6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMichelle Munoz vs Andrianna Cole1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesNettie Trinh / Catherine Pronga vs Tina Battle / Suzan Marcinkovich6-2, 6-4
2025-08-15vs Corpus-Slam ShotsLost 05
L#1 DoublesLee Warth / Keegan Kennedy vs Mary Lupe Arana / Jane Huston6-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMarni Christmas vs Saifon Murray1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSharon Chesnutt / Christine Muzy vs Rhonda Brown / Christie Madali4-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesMichelle Munoz vs Catherine Clark2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesPenny Arnold / Carey Olson vs Roxana Aguilar / Vicki Jamison6-7, 1-6
2025-08-15vs Houston-Greatest HitsLost 05
L#1 DoublesLee Warth / Andrea Pikoff vs Diem Pham / Janet Tran3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesCarey Olson vs Vivian Huang0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPenny Arnold / Keegan Kennedy vs Elim Yeoh / Sheryl Cohen2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJessica Lesh vs Maskuroh Schurter2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCarmela Gillenwater / Christine Muzy vs Veronica Barnhill / Cari Curtis3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · Ladies 3.5 Flight
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1San Angelo-High Strung4014614147
2Houston-Greatest Hits4014616148
3NOHO-Wise Aces3111921175
4Corpus-Slam Shots2212820189
5Waco-Backhand Beauties2211921185
6NOHO-Lucky Strings22101023165
7Mission-Tennis Gals1391126184
8Houston-TennisNEday1371328192
9Austin-Serve It Up1351531223
10Corpus-Tennisy Whiskey0471327197

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Lee Warth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Penny Arnold
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Marni Christmas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.18
Jessica Lesh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.17
Carmela Gillenwater
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Catherine Pronga
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Christine Muzy
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Andrea Pikoff
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Alison Segura
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Keegan Kennedy
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Sharon Chesnutt
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.95
Carey Olson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.92
Nettie Trinh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Michelle Munoz
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lee Warth + Keegan Kennedy5354% games+6.6% vs expected
Keegan Kennedy + Jessica Lesh2345% games+4.1% vs expected
Penny Arnold + Carey Olson2450% games+3.4% vs expected
Penny Arnold + Christine Muzy8852% games+2.8% vs expected
Lee Warth + Sharon Chesnutt7357% games−1.1% vs expected
Carmela Gillenwater + Christine Muzy3346% games−2.7% vs expected
Penny Arnold + Keegan Kennedy7453% games−4.3% vs expected
Lee Warth + Andrea Pikoff7452% games−6.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lee Warth
54W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.37
Penny Arnold
45W–52L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
Marni Christmas
39W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.31
Jessica Lesh
37W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Carmela Gillenwater
41W–58L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Catherine Pronga
32W–47L career · 1 line in 2025
15%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Christine Muzy
30W–36L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Andrea Pikoff
37W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Alison Segura
37W–48L career · 2 lines in 2025
32%67%<1%
3.06
Keegan Kennedy
56W–47L career · 3 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
Sharon Chesnutt
24W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.96
3
Carey Olson
18W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Nettie Trinh
20W–43L career · 1 line in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.92
Michelle Munoz
29W–40L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.