Teams

Wood/SH 40s 8.0X

2026 TUL MIXED 40 & Over League · 8.0 MIXED

15 players · average NTRP 3.83 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-03vs Martinez/IS 40s 8.0XLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephen Confer / Diane Wood vs Bryan Lehman / Shelley Bradshaw5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Chalkin / Stefanie Atherton vs Michael Abboud / Tammy Mathias4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMatthew Bristow / Wendy Brooks vs George Martinez / Kelli Collins2-6, 1-6
2026-04-26vs Freed/PH 40s 8.0XLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrian Chalkin / Diane Wood vs Jillian Vivion / Jody Vivion4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBeth Goddard / Brian Woodliff vs Craig Loseke / Megan Tulloch3-6, 3-6
2026-04-20vs Stitt/LF/40s 8.0XLost 03
L#1 DoublesDiane Wood / Brian Woodliff vs Edward Obana / Mandy Obana4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStefanie Atherton / WIlliam Woodring vs Kelly Goza / Tom Schmidt6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesWendy Brooks / Matthew Wollmershauser vs Julianna Adams / Todd Habiger4-6, 1-6
2026-04-20vs Webster/LF 40s 8.0XSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDiane Wood / Stephen Confer vs Stephanie Patterson / Matthew Prim6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesEric Tabor / Stefanie Atherton vs Brian Webster / Petrina Holloway1-6, 2-6
2026-04-19vs Bayer/LF 40s8.0XSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBeth Goddard / Brian Woodliff vs Eden Evans / Gregory Kopervos2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDevon Chatley / WIlliam Woodring vs Natalie Spreiter / Seth Spreiter6-3, 7-5
2026-04-10vs OK/Salehy/40&over8.0XWon 21
W#1 DoublesDiane Wood / Eric Tabor vs Kristen Lese / Matthew Lese5-4
W#2 DoublesDevon Chatley / Matthew Bristow vs Ashley Stone / Chuy Socarro6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBeth Goddard / Matthew Wollmershauser vs Jolly Salehy / Ann Stone1-6, 1-6
2026-03-27vs Martinez/IS 40s 8.0XLost 02
L#1 DoublesDiane Wood / Matthew Wollmershauser vs Beau Evans / Janet Chambers0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGregory Brooks / Wendy Brooks vs Brian Conway / Kathy Blackim2-6, 2-6
2026-03-22vs Freed/PH 40s 8.0XLost 03
L#1 DoublesStefanie Atherton / Eric Tabor vs Carmen Freed / Ryan Kelly2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Goddard / Matthew Bristow vs Stephanie Galles / Kevin Gore7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBrian Woodliff / Diane Wood vs Jody Vivion / Jillian Vivion2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 8.0 MIXED
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OK/Salehy/40&over8.0X8120722232
2Webster/LF 40s 8.0X7218923217
3Martinez/IS 40s 8.0X5315922206
4Freed/PH 40s 8.0X35111330222
5Bayer/LF 40s8.0X3591533240
6Stitt/LF/40s 8.0X26101431232
7Wood/SH 40s 8.0X1742041271

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Michael Coonce
published
3.81
Jessica Block
published
Brian Chalkin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Eric Tabor
published 4
3.58
Wendy Brooks
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.56
Matthew Bristow
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.56
Stephen Confer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Diane Wood
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.44
Devon Chatley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Matthew Wollmershauser
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Beth Goddard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.30
Brian Woodliff
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
WIlliam Woodring
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.04
Stefanie Atherton
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Gregory Brooks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Brooks + Gregory Brooks01138% gamesnot enough data
Matthew Wollmershauser + Beth Goddard044 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Wollmershauser + Diane Wood033 matchesnot enough data
Stefanie Atherton + Brian Chalkin213 matchesnot enough data
Brian Chalkin + Diane Wood123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Coonce
58W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.97
Jessica Block
55W–31L career · no lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Brian Chalkin
27W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Eric Tabor
26W–19L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Wendy Brooks
46W–73L career · 3 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.58
Matthew Bristow
103W–77L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.56
Stephen Confer
22W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
32%67%<1%
3.56
4
Diane Wood
146W–157L career · 7 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Devon Chatley
43W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%67%32%
3.44
Matthew Wollmershauser
97W–111L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
4
Beth Goddard
6W–20L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
3.34
3.5
Brian Woodliff
43W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
WIlliam Woodring
27W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
Stefanie Atherton
40W–77L career · 4 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.04
Gregory Brooks
1W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.