Teams

FK Paris - Barlet

2026 Marion Adult 55 & Over Winter · 8.0 W Saturday

14 players · average NTRP 3.80 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-29vs Marion/SchappellLost 12
L#1 DoublesHeidi Yates / Marlene Townsend vs Kelly Armagost / Mime Ichini-Lurie3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChristine Padron / Lynn Godwin vs Karyn Dolan / Patty Swanson1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBonnie Keating / Beatrice Barlet vs Linda Jones / Dina Sapienza7-6, 6-2
2026-03-28vs SkyviewLost 12
L#1 DoublesLynn Godwin / Christine Padron vs Ellen Barnes / Sarah Collinson6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Bosco / Heidi Yates vs Linda Lademann / Heather Hagar6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBeatrice Barlet / Bonnie Keating vs Katja Morris / Tracy Shisler6-2, 6-4
2026-03-21vs SkyviewWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristine Padron / Lynn Godwin vs Nancy Fetzer / Rayetta Spina6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesHeidi Yates / Marlene Townsend vs Heather Hagar / Peggy Ridgway4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMylan Barfield / Beatrice Barlet vs Sarah Collinson / Tracy Shisler1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-03-08vs FK CentonzeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChristine Padron / Lynn Godwin vs Kimberly Scudder Thompson / Victoria McClintock6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBonnie Keating / Beatrice Barlet vs Beth Riendeau / Susan Atwell4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-02-28vs FK Walsh 8Won 21
W#1 DoublesBeatrice Barlet / Jami Nordenstam vs Carmen Rosario / Mary Jeanne Walsh6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesHeidi Yates / Julie Haynes vs Lori Croy / Valerie Elvin4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLynn Godwin / Christine Padron vs Kathy Kelly / Susan Garrick6-1, 6-3
2026-02-07vs Marion/SchappellLost 03
L#1 DoublesJudy Hoops / Elizabeth Bosco vs Yvonne Schappell / Mime Ichini-Lurie1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Haynes / Bonnie Keating vs Michelle Nathan / Michelle Miluk3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTerry Shick / Diane Cassidy vs Nancy Rushman / Patty Swanson1-6, 3-6
2026-01-31vs FK CentonzeWon 21
W#1 DoublesJami Nordenstam / Beatrice Barlet vs Gwenda Ward / Kimberly Scudder Thompson6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMylan Barfield / Julie Haynes vs Nancy Little / Ellen Perrone7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesChristine Padron / Terry Shick vs Beth Riendeau / Pamela Plumlee2-6, 2-6
2026-01-24vs FK Walsh 8Won 21
L#1 DoublesDiane Cassidy / Terry Shick vs Debra Bianculli / Jill Kimball4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChristine Padron / Beatrice Barlet vs Wendy MacMurray / Kathy Kelly7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHeidi Yates / Mylan Barfield vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Bonnie Keating
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Debbie Bowers
published 4
3.64
Lynn Godwin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.63
Christine Padron
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.58
Mylan Barfield
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Beatrice Barlet
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.45
Heidi Yates
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.41
Judy Hoops
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Diane Cassidy
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.29
Marlene Townsend
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Elizabeth Bosco
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jami Nordenstam
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Haynes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Terry Shick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bonnie Keating + Beatrice Barlet314 matchesnot enough data
Lynn Godwin + Christine Padron224 matchesnot enough data
Mylan Barfield + Beatrice Barlet404 matchesnot enough data
Judy Hoops + Elizabeth Bosco213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bonnie Keating
243W–234L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Debbie Bowers
25W–26L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lynn Godwin
8W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.64
4
Christine Padron
3W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.63
Mylan Barfield
100W–53L career · 3 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Beatrice Barlet
100W–104L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.55
Heidi Yates
31W–52L career · 9 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
3.45
Judy Hoops
16W–19L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Diane Cassidy
13W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Marlene Townsend
181W–153L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Elizabeth Bosco
7W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jami Nordenstam
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Julie Haynes
10W–1L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Terry Shick
65W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.