Teams

3.TOC.Blanc

2022 CTRL Adult 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.31 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-08vs 7.TOC.LeippeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBracha Blanc / Nan Hu vs Bladen Leippe / Amanda Mueller7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPamela Godwin / Chrissy Morgan vs Jamie McCallum / Jennifer Wolborsky6-3, 6-0
2022-04-24vs 4.TOC.BurrWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaurie Keilholz / Stephannie Messina vs Lisa Bakowski / Hope Graney3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBracha Blanc / Nan Hu vs Christine Burr / Neepa Patel7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNatalie Naramor / Aulia Tandradinata vs Anna Jones / Olga Stephens6-3, 6-3
2022-04-16vs 2.MD.OldhamSplit 22
W#1 DoublesNatalie Naramor / Laurie Keilholz vs Angie Bostrom / Brinette Myers7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAbigail Holden vs Brigette Flower6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesStephannie Messina / Katie Whitley vs Kristen Fritz / Meredith Heath6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWendy McMillan / Stefanie Raysich vs Jennifer Alviano / Cait Bauer4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-04-03vs 7.TOC.LeippeWon 21
L#1 DoublesWendy McMillan / Natalie Naramor vs Amanda Mueller / Kathy Lundholm5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesPamela Godwin / Chrissy Morgan vs Cam Frye / Marguerite Rogers6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesStefanie Raysich / Katie Whitley vs Wendy Sielaty / Marie Gelston6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2022-03-27vs 1.CAS.KuzmaWon 40
W#1 DoublesBracha Blanc / Nan Hu vs Gail Stone / Victoria Whetzel6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAbigail Holden vs Jennifer Kuzma6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPamela Godwin / Chrissy Morgan vs Sally Kennedy / Katrina KUCZYNSKI6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesStephannie Messina / Katie Whitley vs Amber Amos / Ellen Haynes6-3, 6-3
2022-03-20vs 4.TOC.BurrLost 12
L#1 DoublesBracha Blanc / Natalie Naramor vs Anna Jones / Olga Stephens3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAbigail Holden vs Lisa Fultz5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesNan Hu / Aulia Tandradinata vs Vanese Clough / Julie Liddle6-4, 6-3
2022-03-20vs 5.TOC.HutchensWon 20
W#1 DoublesNan Hu / Aulia Tandradinata vs Cindy Bunce / Kristi Laan6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPamela Godwin / Chrissy Morgan vs Cheryl Kata / Michelle Murrell6-2, 6-1
2022-03-14vs 6.TOC.LeahyWon 31
L#1 DoublesBracha Blanc / Rita Burgess vs LuAnn Eyerman / Marisa Terruso4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAbigail Holden vs Cecily Peterson6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesWendy McMillan / Stefanie Raysich vs Kathleen Healey / Lisa Goodman7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNan Hu / Aulia Tandradinata vs Jennifer Leahy / Anne Grimm6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Nan Hu
published
3.33
Natalie Naramor
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.31
Berna Tareen
published 3.5
3.31
Aulia Tandradinata
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.25
Stephannie Messina
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.23
Abigail Holden
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.88
Rita Burgess
published
2.77
Pamela Godwin
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.68
Bracha Blanc
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.64
Stefanie Raysich
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Abigail Holden + Natalie Naramor11956% games+7.6% vs expected
Natalie Naramor + Aulia Tandradinata271159% games+0.3% vs expected
Stefanie Raysich + Bracha Blanc4545% gamesnot enough data
Abigail Holden + Bracha Blanc7163% gamesnot enough data
Abigail Holden + Aulia Tandradinata3255% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Godwin + Bracha Blanc404 matchesnot enough data
Bracha Blanc + Natalie Naramor314 matchesnot enough data
Aulia Tandradinata + Stephannie Messina213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nan Hu
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Natalie Naramor
182W–88L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Berna Tareen
9W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Aulia Tandradinata
283W–130L career · 10 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Stephannie Messina
122W–62L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Abigail Holden
129W–79L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Rita Burgess
20W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Pamela Godwin
50W–60L career · 8 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Bracha Blanc
291W–289L career · 8 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Stefanie Raysich
72W–45L career · 3 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.