Teams

The Village Idiots

2023 18&Over Men · 3.0

15 players · average NTRP 2.75 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-11vs Western: NouhLost 14
L#1 DoublesThomas Hadala / Timothy Smith vs Mostafa Nouh / Kevin Vinh4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJake Bonar vs James Wang6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTim Hussar / Alec Meyer vs Rutao Yao / Vincent Lotempio1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKevin Lickers vs Jun Wang0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPrashant Pendyala / Javid Rzayev vs Daniel Cline / Ronald Cummins1-6, 2-6
2023-07-05vs Western: NouhLost 05
L#1 DoublesTimothy Smith / Michael Feehan vs Daniel Cline / Joe O'Connor1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJake Bonar vs Kevin Vinh7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJavid Rzayev / Thomas Revelas vs Mostafa Nouh / Ronald Cummins0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKevin Lickers vs Reza Moghaddaszadeh2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNick Melson / Tim Hussar vs Gabriel Drummond Guilherme / Rutao Yao3-6, 4-6
2023-06-21vs Western: NouhLost 05
L#1 DoublesMichael Feehan / Tim Hussar vs Mostafa Nouh / Vincent Lotempio2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKevin Lickers vs Evan Roth2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAlec Meyer / Thomas Revelas vs David Gottfried / Joe O'Connor1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJavid Rzayev vs Jun Wang1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesNick Melson / Doug Bax vs Reza Moghaddaszadeh / George Socco2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-06-13vs Western: NouhLost 23
W#1 DoublesTimothy Smith / Thomas Hadala vs Rutao Yao / James Wang6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesJake Bonar vs Jun Wang6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesNick Melson / Michael Feehan vs Kevin Vinh / Ronald Cummins1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAlec Meyer vs Gabriel Drummond Guilherme1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesThomas Liptak / Doug Bax vs George Socco / Daniel Cline0-6, 1-6
2023-06-06vs Western: NouhLost 05
L#1 DoublesThomas Hadala / Michael Feehan vs Ronald Cummins / Rutao Yao5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesPrashant Pendyala vs Evan Roth0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJavid Rzayev / Alec Meyer vs David Gottfried / Daniel Cline0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesNick Melson vs Reza Moghaddaszadeh3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDoug Bax / Thomas Liptak vs Kevin Vinh / Gabriel Drummond Guilherme0-6, 0-6
2023-05-31vs Western: NouhLost 05
L#1 DoublesTimothy Smith / Michael Feehan vs Kevin Vinh / Gabriel Drummond Guilherme1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKevin Lickers vs James Wang2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTim Hussar / Thomas Hadala vs Mostafa Nouh / Rutao Yao2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesPrashant Pendyala vs Reza Moghaddaszadeh3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAlec Meyer / Javid Rzayev vs Evan Roth / Daniel Cline0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Western: Nouh6027310135
2The Village Idiots0632755347

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Timothy Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jake Bonar
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.71
Tim Hussar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Alec Meyer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 2.5
Curt Ventresca
published
Doug Bax
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Javid Rzayev
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Kevin Lickers
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Michael Feehan
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Nick Melson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Prashant Pendyala
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Ryan Palm
published
Thomas Hadala
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Thomas Liptak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Revelas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nick Melson + Tim Hussar123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Timothy Smith
12W–16L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Jake Bonar
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tim Hussar
12W–12L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
2.71
2.5
Alec Meyer
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Curt Ventresca
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Doug Bax
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Javid Rzayev
2W–9L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kevin Lickers
7W–15L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Feehan
2W–7L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nick Melson
3W–15L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Prashant Pendyala
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Ryan Palm
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Thomas Hadala
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Thomas Liptak
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Thomas Revelas
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.