Teams

PA Bont SSL A18-4.0M

2022 WMI SSL USTA League Adult 18&Over Weekend Leagues · WMI SSL A18&O 4.0 M (8 player)

17 players · average NTRP 4.11 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-06-04vs WH Custodio SSL A18-4.0MSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLong Vu / Trent Pontious vs Ben Critz / Ryan Langejans6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDaniel Bragg vs Mike West6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRon Patrick / Mark Elders vs Don Custodio / William Hodgman5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJack Ponstine / Scott Bont vs Sean Lindsay / Marty McKenna5-7, 3-6
2022-03-27vs WH Custodio SSL A18-4.0MWon 31
W#1 DoublesTrent Pontious / Long Vu vs Lin Bao / Curtis Leibbrand6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesRon Patrick vs Jeremy Nufer3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesDavid VanderWeele / Daniel Huan vs Don Custodio / Greg Watts6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSpencer Trnka / Andrew Rolls vs William Hodgman / Erik Larsen6-4, 6-4
2021-05-15vs WH Custodio SSL A18-4.0MWon 20
W#1 DoublesTrent Pontious / Eric Schilthuis vs Curtis Leibbrand / Robert Padgett6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJack Ponstine / Long Vu vs Don Custodio / Ryan Langejans6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WMI SSL A18&O 4.0 M (8 player) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Spencer Trnka
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.26
Daniel Huan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Andrew Rolls
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.82
Trent Pontious
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.75
Scott Arlen
published
David VanderWeele
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Harrison Brode
published 4
3.72
Daniel Bragg
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.61
Damien Arthur
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Jack Ponstine
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Ron Patrick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.56
Mark Elders
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Steven Deroos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Scott Bont
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Alan Bont
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Joe Morris
published
Long Vu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Damien Arthur + Trent Pontious11558% games+9.3% vs expected
Jack Ponstine + Scott Bont4747% games−6.9% vs expected
David VanderWeele + Steven Deroos4165% gamesnot enough data
Scott Bont + Scott Arlen1442% gamesnot enough data
Scott Bont + Trent Pontious2343% gamesnot enough data
Scott Bont + Alan Bont044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Spencer Trnka
26W–13L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Daniel Huan
69W–22L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Andrew Rolls
20W–16L career · 1 line in 2022
11%88%<1%
4.16
Trent Pontious
38W–26L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
Scott Arlen
56W–37L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
David VanderWeele
18W–8L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
4
Harrison Brode
19W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Daniel Bragg
31W–24L career · 1 line in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Damien Arthur
26W–10L career · 1 line in 2022
19%80%<1%
3.61
4
Jack Ponstine
51W–50L career · 2 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.59
Ron Patrick
149W–100L career · 4 lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.58
Mark Elders
10W–20L career · 1 line in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
Steven Deroos
41W–31L career · 1 line in 2022
74%26%<1%
3.42
Scott Bont
60W–107L career · 1 line in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Alan Bont
9W–11L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Joe Morris
28W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Long Vu
33W–13L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.