Teams

WI Adult 55&O 8.0W NEL Oshkosh YMCA Naslund

2025 WI Adult 55 & Over · WI Adult 55 & Over 8.0 women

8 players · average NTRP 3.92 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#2 DoublesCarol Naslund / Sue Novak vs Jessica Genske / Kristin Harty6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarol Naslund / Michelle Vandenberg vs Kristin Harty / Christy Policy6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Naslund / Debbie Beyer vs Amy Lemerond / Betsy Plummer6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCarol Naslund / Michelle Vandenberg vs Jessica Genske / Kristin Harty5-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Adult 55 & Over 8.0 women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Andrea Maher
published 4
Barbara Carlson
published 4
Christine Mayer
published 4
3.57
Debbie Beyer
published 4
3.54
Michelle Vandenberg
published
3.53
Carol Naslund
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Cindy Buchta
published 3.5
Sue Novak
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Naslund + Barbara Carlson5256% games+5.9% vs expected
Carol Naslund + Michelle Vandenberg8360% games−0.3% vs expected
Michelle Vandenberg + Andrea Maher4252% gamesnot enough data
Andrea Maher + Christine Mayer404 matchesnot enough data
Carol Naslund + Andrea Maher213 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Vandenberg + Debbie Beyer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrea Maher
37W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Barbara Carlson
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Christine Mayer
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Debbie Beyer
12W–8L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
Michelle Vandenberg
24W–14L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
4
Carol Naslund
124W–86L career · 4 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Cindy Buchta
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sue Novak
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.