Teams

RP: Brian Steere

2022 RI Adult 18 & Over Men · 4.5 Men

14 players · average NTRP 4.36 / RHODE ISLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-20vs EB: GarceauWon 21
L#1 DoublesDan Hall / Jeffrey Johnson vs Steven Viera / Patrick Walker3-6, 7-5, 4-3
W#1 SinglesJeffrey Denunzio vs Hunter Moore7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMarco Amendola / Dmitry Meyerson vs Charles Dickson / Adam Cargin6-3, 6-2
2022-07-17vs RP: Tim SteereLost 13
L#1 DoublesDan Hall / David Azzolina vs Vidith Huot / Joseph Parenti1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAnthony Mesiti / Dmitry Meyerson vs Jason Marsocci / Michael Curran0-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesJeffrey Denunzio vs Eric Kravitz7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesZac Goldberg / Neil Chapralis vs Gary McEldowney / Tim Steere6-7, 1-6
2022-07-10vs LK: Anthony/PieperSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSteven Clements / Dan Hall vs Richard Anthony / Eric Kendall6-4, 3-6, 2-1
L#1 SinglesJeffrey Denunzio vs Trevor Schwarzmann2-6, 2-6
2022-06-18vs EB: GarceauWon 20
W#1 DoublesDan Hall / Dmitry Meyerson vs Charles Dickson / Paulo Guilhardi6-3, 7-5
W#2 SinglesJeffrey Denunzio vs Jarod Zizza6-2, 6-1
2022-06-12vs RP: Tim SteereLost 04
L#1 DoublesBrian Steere / Christopher Marcello vs Matthew Dubois / Marc Dubois6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDan Hall / Steven Clements vs Joseph Parenti / Ben Lantz6-2, 5-7, 3-4
L#2 SinglesAnthony Mesiti vs Andrew Steere3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRyan Morin / Jeffrey Johnson vs Gary McEldowney / Matthew Dipippo0-6, 4-6
2022-06-03vs LK: Anthony/PieperLost 03
L#1 DoublesDan Hall / Ryan Morin vs Filipe Miguel / Eric Kendall1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Denunzio / Andrew Brown vs Garland Kimmer / Aaron Petruski4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesZac Goldberg / Neil Chapralis vs Jonathan Sanders / Christopher Dohner3-6, 3-6
2022-05-26vs BB: Berkowitz/HenshawSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMarco Amendola / Dan Hall vs Hamzah Henshaw / Alexander Stalley7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKeith Kron / Zac Goldberg vs TJ Ostrander / Jonathan Bram1-6, 6-7
2022-05-12vs BB: Berkowitz/HenshawLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Johnson / Andrew Brown vs Hamzah Henshaw / Alexander Stalley3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesDavid Azzolina vs Xavier ELBAZ5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKeith Kron / Dan Hall vs Jonathan Bram / Sreeram Chakrapani2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Jeffrey Denunzio
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
4.29
Dan Hall
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Andrew Brown
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Anthony Mesiti
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Brian Steere
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
David Azzolina
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.93
Steven Clements
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.89
Dmitry Meyerson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.85
Ryan Morin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.59
Neil Chapralis
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
3.58
Keith Kron
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Christopher Marcello
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
Jeffrey Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Zac Goldberg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steven Clements + Neil Chapralis4251% games+2.6% vs expected
Jeffrey Denunzio + Andrew Brown1444% gamesnot enough data
Christopher Marcello + Jeffrey Johnson314 matchesnot enough data
Steven Clements + Dmitry Meyerson224 matchesnot enough data
Neil Chapralis + Dmitry Meyerson134 matchesnot enough data
Christopher Marcello + Neil Chapralis213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeffrey Denunzio
24W–20L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
4.43
4.5
Dan Hall
45W–31L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
4.29
4.5
Andrew Brown
10W–22L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Anthony Mesiti
41W–29L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Brian Steere
17W–17L career · type M · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
4.5
David Azzolina
12W–16L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Steven Clements
29W–25L career · 10 lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
3.93
4
Dmitry Meyerson
28W–29L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.89
Ryan Morin
10W–17L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
Neil Chapralis
41W–82L career · 11 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Keith Kron
20W–37L career · 2 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Christopher Marcello
62W–48L career · 5 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
Jeffrey Johnson
38W–39L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Zac Goldberg
11W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.