Teams

FBurbano

2022 Cap Spring USTA 18 & over · 3.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-20vs CSutlerWon 20
W#1 SinglesTodd Sprouse vs Jason Grieco6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesFrancisco Burbano vs Jeremy Broglin7-5, 6-3
2022-05-12vs DFarmer 3.0Won 20
W#2 SinglesTodd Sprouse vs Clay Fussell6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTerry Bollinger / Francisco Burbano vs Gerald Coleman / PEDRO J LEON6-3, 6-3
2022-04-30vs RBAdamsSplit 11
W#1 SinglesFrancisco Burbano vs Adam Whitesell6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTodd Sprouse / Michael Ratliff vs Robb Adams / Edwin Braswell3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-04-23vs RMarriott/7OaksWon 20
W#1 DoublesFrancisco Burbano / Todd Sprouse vs Dewayne Southern / Emory Miller4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlessandro Montanari / Terry Bollinger vs Mike Uhland / Vladic Khodush4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-04-02vs CSutlerLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlessandro Montanari / Michael Ratliff vs Cody Sutler / Charles King2-6, 3-6
2022-03-26vs DFarmer 3.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesAlessandro Montanari / Michael Ratliff vs David Hayworth / Dennis Byrd Jr7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesTodd Sprouse vs Adam Bryan1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesFrancisco Burbano vs Measho Haile6-1, 6-0
2022-03-20vs RMarriott/7OaksWon 10
W#1 DoublesFrancisco Burbano / Todd Sprouse vs Vladic Khodush / Shawn Skillman6-0, 6-1
2022-03-19vs RBAdamsLost 01
L#1 DoublesTodd Sprouse / Alessandro Montanari vs Max Stevenson - (DQ) / Brad Kelly2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Michael Ratliff
published
3.13
Francisco Burbano
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
2.98
Alessandro Montanari
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.84
Todd Sprouse
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
2.63
Peter Flack
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Todd Sprouse + Francisco Burbano6552% games+1.2% vs expected
Todd Sprouse + Alessandro Montanari4450% gamesnot enough data
Alessandro Montanari + Francisco Burbano134 matchesnot enough data
Francisco Burbano + Michael Ratliff213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Ratliff
30W–24L career · no lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Francisco Burbano
79W–83L career · 10 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
3
Alessandro Montanari
102W–90L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
2.98
3
Todd Sprouse
85W–99L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84
Peter Flack
11W–27L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.