Teams

Yadkin/Kaplan/18+6.5

2026 Yadkin Valley Combo 18 & Over · Women 6.5 - Tuesday Nights

14 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 8 6:30 PM
Westwood Swim and Tennis Club
Sep 15 6:30 PM
Sarah Kaplan
Sep 22 6:30 PM
Deana Georgitis
Sep 29 6:30 PM
Lela Ray
Oct 6 6:30 PM
Sarah Kaplan
Oct 13 6:30 PM
Jennifer KellerHillary Stevens
2026-09-01vs Yadkin/Kim/18+6.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesKatherine Heath / Colleen Isaacson vs Kathleen Punger / Meghan Webb6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCandace Bowman / Chanel Griggs vs Linda Barabasova / Arianna Armin2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-08-25vs Yadkin/Brice-Ray/OT/18+6.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesHannah Giles / Betsy Harris vs Becca Breeden / Jennie Smith6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJoAnn White / Julie Long vs Katie Allen / Anne Tyson Edwards1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesNora Ferrell / Kristie Moesner vs Gates Spilman / Rebecca Reece6-1, 7-5
2026-08-20vs Yadkin/Francis/18+6.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKatherine Heath / Amy Braden vs Ginger Ballard / Gaines Douglas0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Kaplan / Kristie Moesner vs Nancy Hart / Walker Jones6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCandace Bowman / Chanel Griggs vs Kathryn Campbell / Jennifer Baker2-6, 1-6
2026-08-18vs Yadkin/Georgitis/FCC/18+6.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesJoAnn White / Betsy Harris vs Melanie Brost / Lucie Temple2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Kaplan / Colleen Isaacson vs Amber Watts / Kelly Mcquellon6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDudley Commander Burkhalter / Torin Liberthson-Brown vs Paige Reilly / Julia Hennessee6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · Women 6.5 - Tuesday Nights
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Yadkin/Keller-Stevens/WW/18+6.52042443
2Yadkin/Francis/18+6.51021216
3Yadkin/Georgitis/FCC/18+6.51142544
4Yadkin/Kaplan/18+6.51133653
5Yadkin/Kim/18+6.50112432
6Yadkin/Brice-Ray/OT/18+6.502151066

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Hannah Giles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
JoAnn White
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Sarah Kaplan
published
3.29
Dudley Commander Burkhalter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Katherine Heath
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Candace Bowman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Nora Ferrell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Betsy Harris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.15
Julie Long
published
3.04
Colleen Isaacson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.80
Kristie Moesner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.66
Amy Braden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Chanel Griggs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
Torin Liberthson-Brown
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Braden + Torin Liberthson-Brown123 matchesnot enough data
JoAnn White + Hannah Giles303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hannah Giles
36W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.65
JoAnn White
38W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
Sarah Kaplan
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
Dudley Commander Burkhalter
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
Katherine Heath
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.28
3.5
Candace Bowman
15W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nora Ferrell
20W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%2%
3.22
3
Betsy Harris
38W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.22
Julie Long
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
3
Colleen Isaacson
29W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.04
Kristie Moesner
21W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Amy Braden
23W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Chanel Griggs
11W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Torin Liberthson-Brown
11W–39L career · 1 line in 2026
27%72%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.