← Teams

Sarasota/Gibson

2022 Sarasota Combo 18 & Over Fall Weeknight · 7.5 W Tuesday Eve

10 players · average NTRP 3.90 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-11-08vs Laurel Oak DocSlice GirlsWon 1–0
W#2 DoublesCarrie Walsh / Kristin Knous vs Jennifer Stroble / Lesley France6-4, 6-2
2022-11-01vs Laurel Oak DocSlice GirlsWon 1–0
W#1 DoublesNina Mortazavi / Zobeida Canfield vs Jennifer Stroble / Sandra Poston6-2, 6-2
2022-10-25vs Laurel Oak DocSlice GirlsWon 1–0
W#3 DoublesKristin Knous / Carrie Walsh vs Teri Sayre / Stephanie Flatt6-3, 6-4
2022-10-18vs Laurel Oak DocSlice GirlsWon 1–0
W#3 DoublesNina Mortazavi / Zobeida Canfield vs Courtney Rosenthal / Kami Yaegers6-2, 6-4
2022-10-04vs Laurel Oak DocSlice GirlsWon 1–0
W#3 DoublesNina Mortazavi / Carrie Walsh vs Yudi Carpenter / Kami Yaegers6-1, 6-4
2022-09-22vs Laurel Oak DocSlice GirlsLost 0–1
L#2 DoublesNina Mortazavi / Zobeida Canfield vs Tanya Keith / Lori Bartkus6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 W Tuesday Eve have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Haley English
published 4.5
3.91
Nina Mortazavi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.76
Kristin Knous
published —
3.71
Sara Johnson
published —
3.67
Marsha Timm
published —
3.56
Carrie Walsh
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.50
Rebecca Gibson
published —
3.42
Cecile Wooster
published 3.5
3.40
Zobeida Canfield
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Zobeida Canfield + Rebecca Gibson6–262% games+4.7% vs expected
Zobeida Canfield + Nina Mortazavi12–1151% games+3.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Haley English
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.29
4
Nina Mortazavi
122W–62L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.91
—
Kristin Knous
10W–3L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
—
Sara Johnson
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
—
Marsha Timm
8W–14L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.67
4
Carrie Walsh
44W–38L career · 3 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.56
—
Rebecca Gibson
25W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Cecile Wooster
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Zobeida Canfield
170W–73L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
—
Michele Vandendooren
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.