Teams

EW-PC-Klontz

2025 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 MEN

9 players · average NTRP 3.10 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-16vs YTC - Smash BrosWon 21
L#1 DoublesChris Denney / Rogelio Espinoza vs Seth Robins / Donovan Jedel4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesHenry Han vs Fred Wells6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDustin Clontz / Ron Custer vs Mike Christianson / Francisco Lara6-2, 6-3
2025-03-15vs YTC - Smash BrosWon 30
W#1 DoublesDustin Clontz / Scott Adams vs Francisco Lara / Frank Sinek6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesGrant Bruneel vs Jake Bradshaw6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRon Custer / Rogelio Espinoza vs Seth Robins / Mike Christianson6-3, 6-2
2025-03-15vs YTC - Smash BrosWon 30
W#1 DoublesChris Denney / Henry Han vs Donovan Jedel / Jake Bradshaw6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesScott Adams vs Seth Robins6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGrant Bruneel / Scott Willes vs Mike Christianson / Fred Wells6-0, 6-1
2025-03-14vs YTC - Smash BrosWon 30
W#1 DoublesGrant Bruneel / Scott Willes vs Seth Robins / Francisco Lara6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesChris Denney vs Fred Wells6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesScott Adams / Rogelio Espinoza vs Frank Sinek / Jake Bradshaw6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2.5 MEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EW-PC-Klontz40111252
2YTC - Smash Bros0411122138

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Michael Khounnala
published 4.5
3.28
Scott Adams
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.74
Grant Bruneel
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.71
Henry Han
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.38
Chris Denney
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Dustin Clontz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.15
Rogelio Espinoza
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Ron Custer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Scott Willes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rogelio Espinoza + Chris Denney033 matchesnot enough data
Scott Adams + Chris Denney213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Michael Khounnala
47W–35L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
4.25
Scott Adams
7W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.28
3
Grant Bruneel
5W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Henry Han
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.71
2.5
Chris Denney
18W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%82%18%
2.38
2.5
Dustin Clontz
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rogelio Espinoza
5W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.15
Ron Custer
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Willes
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.