Teams

LATA18/Meyers/RC

2023 Mixed 18 & Over - USTA · 7.0 Adult Mixed Doubles

16 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-05-24vs LATA18-Henderson-LCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesBarry Mathews / Susan Mathews vs Mac Warzecha / Randi Vogel5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-04-26vs LATA18-LJoye-LCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesSusan Mathews / Barry Mathews vs Steve Sklar / Page Edwards6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Katie Meyers
published
3.97
Amy Redfield
published 4
3.89
Guy Kirtley
published
3.79
Jenkins Mann
published
3.76
Jim Wescott
published
3.65
Sandy Shannon
published
3.53
3.52
Barry Mathews
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.50
Susan Mathews
published
3.47
Kay Wescott
published
3.41
Brannon Hagins
published 3.5
3.21
Leslie Downs
published
3.17
Wendel Franklin
published
2.91
Tony Pfeiffer
published
2.70
Marybeth Meyers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Mathews + Barry Mathews17360% games+7.6% vs expected
Kay Wescott + Jim Wescott314 matchesnot enough data
Jenkins Mann + Katie Meyers404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Meyers
14W–9L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
4.03
4
Amy Redfield
68W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
3.97
Guy Kirtley
13W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.89
Jenkins Mann
65W–40L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
Jim Wescott
23W–15L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.76
Sandy Shannon
127W–38L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.65
Thiagu Chandrasekaran
118W–42L career · no lines in 2023
<1%40%60%
3.53
3.5
Barry Mathews
212W–65L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.52
Susan Mathews
39W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.50
Kay Wescott
66W–38L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Brannon Hagins
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.41
Leslie Downs
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
Wendel Franklin
27W–14L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Tony Pfeiffer
58W–53L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%26%
2.91
Marybeth Meyers
14W–9L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.70
Jaimee Gauthier-Pensa
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.