Teams

Pulley/Nashville

2026 Adult 65 & Over - Nashville · 3.5 Women - Saturday Daytime

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-18vs Baker/Bright/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesStephanie Dunkle / Joan Mensinger vs Nell Adams / Mary Stone6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Mattson / Jane Ringel vs Linda Ashford / Kimberly Baker7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMarian Leary / Mary Agee vs Wendy Baker / Lisa Beasley6-0, 6-2
2026-07-11vs Jones/NashvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesStephanie Dunkle / Mary Agee vs Pat Yung-Okamoto / Constance Baker4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesVeronica Pulley / Beth Molteni vs Jeanne Moran-Jones / Joann Covington4-6, 4-6
2026-06-27vs Baker/Bright/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarian Leary / Mary Agee vs Allison Braswell / Lee Oakley6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesStephanie Dunkle / Joan Mensinger vs Kim Bright / Kimberly Baker6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJane Ringel / Susan Mattson vs Wendy Baker / Mary Barton7-5, 6-4
2026-06-06vs Baker/Bright/NashvilleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMarian Leary / Mary Agee vs Kimberly Baker / Mary Candice Burger4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesVeronica Pulley / Beth Molteni vs Kim Bright / Lisa Beasley7-6, 6-3
2026-05-23vs Jones/NashvilleLost 12
W#1 DoublesMarian Leary / Gay Suiter vs Julie Carpenter / Sally Goodrich3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStephanie Dunkle / Kimberly Brown vs Pat Yung-Okamoto / Joann Covington0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesVeronica Pulley / Beth Molteni vs Jamie Tilley / Nita Hollis1-6, 2-6
2026-05-16vs Jones/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarian Leary / Gay Suiter vs Joann Covington / Nita Hollis6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJoan Mensinger / Jane Ringel vs Susan Furman / Cynthia Weatherly2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJoni Beebe / Stephanie Dunkle vs Constance Baker / Betty Tudor3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women - Saturday Daytime have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Marian Leary
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.22
Donna Tutt
published
3.18
Gay Suiter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Stephanie Dunkle
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.12
Mary Agee
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.11
Jane Ringel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.99
Beth Molteni
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Joan Mensinger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.82
Veronica Pulley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.57
Joni Beebe
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Nancy Allan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Dunkle + Veronica Pulley213 matchesnot enough data
Veronica Pulley + Beth Molteni123 matchesnot enough data
Veronica Pulley + Nancy Allan033 matchesnot enough data
Marian Leary + Mary Agee213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marian Leary
12W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Donna Tutt
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
3.22
Gay Suiter
13W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Stephanie Dunkle
10W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Mary Agee
4W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.12
Jane Ringel
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Beth Molteni
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.99
Joan Mensinger
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.98
Veronica Pulley
13W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
2.82
Joni Beebe
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.57
Nancy Allan
2W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.