Teams

Pekarne 40+ 7.5W

2022 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 Women 40 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-09-28vs Burke - 40+ 7.5WWon 10
W#1 DoublesMissy Chance / Libby Strickland vs Lynn Chafin / Vickie Degges6-2, 6-1
2022-09-21vs Westrick 40+ 7.5WWon 10
W#3 DoublesJennie Pekarne / Libby Strickland vs Bonnie Satterfield / Ann Hartley6-4, 6-1
2022-08-24vs BECK - 40+ 7.5WWon 10
W#1 DoublesLinda Hall / Martha Cox vs Anita Allis / Glenda Burkett6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2022-08-17vs Albright 40+ 7.5WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSusan Calkins / Linda Hall vs Kimberly Halsey / Emily Wilson5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKathryn Michaud / Libby Strickland vs Marla Barnwell / Britt Flanagan3-6, 5-7
2022-08-11vs KBrown 40+ 7.6WLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennie Pekarne / Linda Hall vs Tara Burgio / Kathryn Egerton3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLibby Strickland / Elaine Ashley vs Sallye Parker / Marsha Tice2-6, 1-6
2022-08-03vs Pace 40+ 7.5WWon 20
W#1 DoublesLinda Hall / Susan Calkins vs Kathy Pace / Gladys Dunn3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLibby Strickland / Missy Chance vs Mary Batts / Robin Smith5-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Libby Strickland
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
3.55
Deborah Nahser
published 4
3.38
Kathryn Michaud
published
3.31
Martha Cox
published
3.25
Susan Calkins
published
Becky Kincaid
published 3.5
2.89
Missy Chance
published
Jennie Pekarne
published
Linda Hall
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Mary Jean Nelson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Libby Strickland + Linda Hall213 matchesnot enough data
Susan Calkins + Becky Kincaid303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Libby Strickland
128W–110L career · 11 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Deborah Nahser
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.55
Kathryn Michaud
22W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.38
Martha Cox
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
93%7%<1%
3.31
Susan Calkins
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Becky Kincaid
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Missy Chance
14W–32L career · no lines in 2022
80%20%<1%
2.89
Jennie Pekarne
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Hall
100W–71L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Jean Nelson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.