Teams

CVTA RED

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-27vs NJ PINKWon 21
W#1 DoublesLori Moehn / Andrea Barsch vs Julie Steven / Nicole Cotta6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMonica Mortenson / Kelly Ruybal vs Amanda Strouth / Anne Townsel6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJanet King / Tara Sisneros vs Mary Rose Wilder / Kathleen Rimlinger2-6, 3-6
2024-05-20vs LTA-Q GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAndrea Barsch / Megan Rudolph vs Emma West / Erika Cistone6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJo Ann Johnson / Kirby Mcilyar vs Krystal Thomas / Rebecca Upthegrove6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesMonica Mortenson vs Jennifer Sardinia4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLori Moehn / Erynn Seidel vs Lindsay Roland / Tammy Duerksen7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-05-13vs MEA REDLost 23
L#1 DoublesLori Moehn / Megan Rudolph vs Jacquie Prescott / Miriam McCarty6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKirby Mcilyar vs Cynthia Shick4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJanet King / Tara Sisneros vs Keryn Schneider / Marianne Martin7-6, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesCristin Hanson vs Claire Lochridge6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesErynn Seidel / Emily Koechel vs Devan Haas / Annabel Stelling5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2024-05-11vs CVTA GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrea Barsch / Megan Rudolph vs Shaun Howe / Emily Vigmostad3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTara Sisneros / Kelly Ruybal vs Lisa Ritchie / Elizabeth Corujo4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesErynn Seidel vs Rashmi Anki6-4, 6-1
2024-04-29vs BRMST GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesCristin Hanson / Kelly Ruybal vs Sharla Prom / Karen Gallo6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKate Resnick / Kirby Mcilyar vs Dawna Eastman-Gallo / Lisa Shaver6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMegan Rudolph / Emily Koechel vs Aimee Lee / Tammie Donohoe6-4, 6-2
2024-04-22vs BCC GOLDLost 14
L#1 DoublesJo Ann Johnson / Kirby Mcilyar vs Kirsten Eldridge / Helen Spiridellis5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLori Moehn vs Sarah Mills3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAndrea Barsch / Megan Rudolph vs Anna Bertagnolli / Juliana Cohen6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesErynn Seidel vs Amy Nichols6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCristin Hanson / Emily Koechel vs Ashley Rogers / Stephanie Retchless7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2024-04-15vs TTA PINKWon 31
W#1 DoublesJo Ann Johnson / Kirby Mcilyar vs Julie Aragon / Carey Price6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAndrea Barsch / Cristin Hanson vs Melissa Dini / Jennifer Arbuckle6-2, 7-5
L#2 SinglesLori Moehn vs Jenna McCormick3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJanet King / Monica Mortenson vs Tammi Chiappone / Tracy Wiske6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Cristin Hanson
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.07
Andrea Barsch
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.06
Kate Resnick
published
2.94
Megan Rudolph
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.89
Erynn Seidel
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.84
Monica Mortenson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.81
Jo Ann Johnson
published
2.76
Kirby Mcilyar
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.71
Lori Moehn
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
2.43
Tara Sisneros
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Emily Koechel
published
Kelly Ruybal
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jo Ann Johnson + Kelly Ruybal7168% games+7.8% vs expected
Kirby Mcilyar + Megan Rudolph4163% games+4.1% vs expected
Jo Ann Johnson + Kirby Mcilyar3252% games+1.9% vs expected
Kelly Ruybal + Monica Mortenson4158% games+1.3% vs expected
Monica Mortenson + Megan Rudolph4450% games−1.2% vs expected
Megan Rudolph + Andrea Barsch4258% gamesnot enough data
Tara Sisneros + Lori Moehn224 matchesnot enough data
Jo Ann Johnson + Monica Mortenson224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cristin Hanson
54W–13L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.07
3
Andrea Barsch
68W–34L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
3.07
Kate Resnick
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Megan Rudolph
55W–32L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
2.94
3
Erynn Seidel
27W–23L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Monica Mortenson
62W–40L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.84
Jo Ann Johnson
23W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Kirby Mcilyar
55W–20L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Lori Moehn
95W–107L career · 5 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Tara Sisneros
47W–57L career · 3 lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
2.43
Emily Koechel
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kelly Ruybal
18W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.