Teams

Shipp

2024 IA 55 & Over Adult Mixed League · 8.0X 55 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / IOWA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-09-08vs IA/Buck-Bruntz/55&Over8.0MXDLost 12
L#1 DoublesDennis Lonzarich / Leslie Shipp vs Kathleen Hansen / Matthew Whipps6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDawn Ver Steeg / Joel Sissel vs Julie Bruntz / Arthur Khaw4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRonald Bradfield / Julie Kinsella vs Lynette Brown / Mark Davidson6-4, 6-0
2024-09-08vs IA/Buck-Bruntz/55&Over8.0MXDLost 12
W#1 DoublesDennis Lonzarich / Leslie Shipp vs Julie Bruntz / Keith Buck6-0, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJoel Sissel / Dawn Ver Steeg vs Angela Beaver / Stu Card0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRonald Bradfield / Julie Kinsella vs Kathleen Hansen / Martin Fisher Jr4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2024-08-11vs IA/Buck-Bruntz/55&Over8.0MXDLost 12
L#1 DoublesDennis Mailes / Carol Mailes vs Stu Card / Angela Beaver2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Heil / Leslie Shipp vs Martin Fisher Jr / Mary Krause2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJoel Sissel / Dawn Ver Steeg vs Matthew Whipps / Holly Shortenhaus6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0X 55 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IA/Buck-Bruntz/55&Over8.0MXD3063770
2Shipp03361282

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Dawn Ver Steeg
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Carol Mailes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Dennis Mailes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Richard Heil
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Ronald Bradfield
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Dennis Lonzarich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Joel Sissel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Julie Kinsella
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Leslie Shipp
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Kinsella + Ronald Bradfield13658% games+7.7% vs expected
Dennis Mailes + Carol Mailes13958% gamesnot enough data
Dawn Ver Steeg + Joel Sissel123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dawn Ver Steeg
76W–30L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Carol Mailes
55W–24L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
4
Dennis Mailes
33W–13L career · type T · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Richard Heil
64W–73L career · 1 line in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
Ronald Bradfield
55W–51L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Dennis Lonzarich
19W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.61
Joel Sissel
28W–21L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Julie Kinsella
39W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Leslie Shipp
64W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.