Teams

Beerman - R. Espitia

2023 Polk Adult 18 & Over - Women · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-21vs Beerman - R. CoultonWon 20
W#1 DoublesGinger Davis / Jennifer Rogers vs Desiree Tchipanova / Allison Sorenson7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSvetlana Darrow vs Kristi McCarter7-5, 6-1
W#1 DoublesJennifer Rogers / Ginger Davis vs Hayley Hurd / Leisa Jordan6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSvetlana Darrow / Jo Anne Weaver vs Rhonda Harris / Laurie Melton6-3, 6-4
2023-02-28vs WHC Raquettes - G. TardyWon 20
W#1 SinglesSvetlana Darrow vs Mary Stine6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGinger Davis / Regina Espitia vs Cindy Muir / Lisa Pearce6-4, 7-6
2023-02-21vs LCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesGinger Davis / Jennifer Rogers vs Lauren Lloyd / Ashley Bailey6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGwen Wearing-Davis / Svetlana Darrow vs Sheryl Norman / Lauren Clark6-3, 7-5
2023-02-07vs Beerman Simply Smashing - T. LoveWon 20
W#1 DoublesGwen Wearing-Davis / Svetlana Darrow vs Leslie Simmons / Julie Goodwin7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesGinger Davis / Regina Espitia vs Rosalinda Collins / Rosa Jean6-2, 6-0
2023-01-31vs Polk/L. Mason/18&Over3.0WLost 02
L#1 SinglesSvetlana Darrow vs Marley McAdams1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGinger Davis / Gwen Wearing-Davis vs Jennifer Burns / Brittany Ward4-6, 0-6
2023-01-24vs Beerman - R. CoultonWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Rogers / Ginger Davis vs Desiree Tchipanova / Allison Sorenson6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSvetlana Darrow vs Jihyeon Choe6-1, 6-1
W#1 DoublesGwen Wearing-Davis / Svetlana Darrow vs Tonna Carter / Sara Margeson6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesEva Mora / Ginger Davis vs Clara Copley / Mary Ellen Guthrie6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Ginger Davis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.81
Laurie Grieger
published
2.80
Senita Hanif
published
2.80
Kristin Wyatt
published
2.74
Svetlana Darrow
usually #1 Singles 59%, also #2 Singles 18% · published
2.67
Regina Espitia
published
2.31
Diane Barrera
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ginger Davis + Svetlana Darrow213 matchesnot enough data
Senita Hanif + Regina Espitia033 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Grieger + Regina Espitia123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ginger Davis
113W–97L career · 8 lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.96
Laurie Grieger
12W–18L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81
Senita Hanif
10W–21L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
2.80
Kristin Wyatt
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
2.80
Svetlana Darrow
86W–95L career · 17 lines in 2023
4%92%3%
2.74
Regina Espitia
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
2.67
2.5
Diane Barrera
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
0%91%9%
2.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.