Teams

Bell & Wofford (Chevy Chase)

2022 Montgomery Adult Other Women's Day Winter · Montgomery Adult Other Women's Day Winter 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.44 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-03-23vs DubrowSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTina Halley / Anne Sherman vs Raina Fishbane / Karen Dubrow7-5, 6-6
L#2 DoublesTamar Henkin / Shirley Hsieh-Lau vs Elizabeth Rahn / Stacey Kohl5-7, 2-6
2022-03-21vs Lakewood 3.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesTamar Henkin / Kimberly Guay vs Anne Porto / Linda Blumenreich2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesChung Kim / Chrystal Goonewardene vs Maite Leo / Cindy Pohoryles3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-03-18vs HjelleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTina Halley / Anne Sherman vs Pamela Hjelle / Christine Nowack2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMara Labourdette / Chrystal Goonewardene vs Lisa Shure / Jackie Solomon1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-03-10vs Manor 3.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesChrystal Goonewardene / Mara Labourdette vs Diana DePaul / Karen Dugan0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-02-14vs SwainLost 01
L#3 DoublesShirley Hsieh-Lau / Chung Kim vs Mary Ege / Joanne Swain6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2022-02-10vs Lakewood 3.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesShirley Hsieh-Lau / Sherry Altman vs Elizabeth Votaw / Jody Sklar4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMara Labourdette / Tamar Henkin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-02-07vs Smart AcesLost 02
L#1 DoublesLisa Morelli / Tina Halley vs Trisha Downey / Mary Asel5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesShirley Hsieh-Lau / Dora Macia vs Holly Radus / Maria Elena Greene2-6, 3-6
2022-02-02vs CareyLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Barton-Dock / Shirley Hsieh-Lau vs Bridget Foist / Katharine Marino6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVeronique Kessler / Tina Halley vs Tracy Ballard / Rebecca Hammond6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Seibel / Tamar Henkin vs Sarah Boyd / Marie Israelite1-6, 3-6
2022-01-27vs IT'S AH RAPPWon 10
W#3 DoublesTamar Henkin / Carrie Wofford vs Lisa Yazdani / Svetlana Sibley6-7, 5-3
2022-01-12Split 11
W#1 DoublesTina Halley / Anne Sherman vs Jody Goren / Laurie Issembert6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChung Kim / Chrystal Goonewardene vs Nancy Britt / Monique Exbrayat4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other Women's Day Winter 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Tina Halley
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.79
Sherry Altman
published
3.37
Penelope Bell
published
Carrie Wofford
published 3.5
Elizabeth Seibel
published 3.5
3.20
Mary Barton-Dock
published
3.15
Shirley Hsieh-Lau
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.11
Tamar Henkin
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.02
Anne Sherman
published 3.5
2.97
Veronique Kessler
published
2.97
Chrystal Goonewardene
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.69
Chung Kim
published 3
2.66
Dora Macia
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tamar Henkin + Chrystal Goonewardene224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tina Halley
128W–66L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.88
Sherry Altman
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
Penelope Bell
18W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Carrie Wofford
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Elizabeth Seibel
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Barton-Dock
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Shirley Hsieh-Lau
81W–131L career · 5 lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Tamar Henkin
116W–147L career · 5 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Anne Sherman
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.02
Veronique Kessler
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
2.97
3.5
Chrystal Goonewardene
33W–41L career · 4 lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
2.97
3
Chung Kim
10W–11L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Dora Macia
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.