Teams

AR/Morrell/LR

2022 Adult 70 & Over Multi-State Championship · 4.0 Plus Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-05-01vs TN/Audrey WoodWon 21
L#1 DoublesKara Ford / Mindy Morrell vs Plum Nobles / Audrey Wood1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDiane Bischof / Karen Demott vs Jeanne Moran-Jones / Brenda Howes4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSip Mouden / Joann McCoy vs Deborah Kershner / Dianne Wright7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2022-04-30vs TN/Audrey WoodLost 12
L#1 DoublesTerrie Hearns Wilkey / Joann McCoy vs Deborah Kershner / Dianne Wright6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Demott / Diane Bischof vs Plum Nobles / Audrey Wood4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKara Ford / Mindy Morrell vs Jeanne Moran-Jones / Zanie Levering7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2022-04-30vs AR/LaGrossa/Hood/GreenbrierLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Demott / Diane Bischof vs Carol Ketchum / Camille LaGrossa5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMindy Morrell / Joann McCoy vs Melinda Hood / Lynnette Hannahs1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTerrie Hearns Wilkey / Sip Mouden vs Linda Ring / Peggy Winborn6-0, 6-0
2022-04-29vs MS/West/MadisonLost 03
L#1 DoublesTerrie Hearns Wilkey / Sip Mouden vs Cheryl Clayton / Barbara Rushton4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJoann McCoy / Kara Ford vs Nina Tomlinson / Jeanne Moak0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDiane Bischof / Karen Demott vs Dinah Singer / Barbara West6-1, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.0 Plus Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MS/West/Madison4093781
2AR/LaGrossa/Hood/Greenbrier227512103
3TN/Audrey Wood134816109
4AR/Morrell/LR134819127

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Diane Bischof
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Kara Ford
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Sip Mouden
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Mindy Morrell
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.89
Joann McCoy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Karen Demott
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Terrie Hearns Wilkey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Bischof + Karen Demott4547% games−0.9% vs expected
Mindy Morrell + Kara Ford2337% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Diane Bischof
31W–16L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
Kara Ford
10W–14L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%89%10%
3.33
Sip Mouden
17W–25L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.25
Mindy Morrell
17W–22L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Joann McCoy
2W–12L career · 4 lines in 2022
81%19%<1%
2.89
Karen Demott
11W–10L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Terrie Hearns Wilkey
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.