Teams

BH - Steed

2024 B'ham Fall - Adult 40 & Over Weekday Women · 4.0 Women Friday

12 players · average NTRP 4.08 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-10-13vs LIfe Time - Barrett/VinsonWon 10
W#2 DoublesLinda Sink / Angie Blaising vs Meredith Vinson / Lani Perrigo6-4, 6-1
2023-10-05vs Homewood - HainesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesHolly Sherrer / Brynee Koretzky vs Andrea Belue / Eunice Ward1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Keene / Angie Blaising vs Mary Haines / Christie Williamson7-5, 6-4
2023-09-29vs BHRC - Ernest fall 40-2024Won 20
W#1 DoublesAngie Blaising / Deanna Carroll vs Donna Gordon / Christine Denniston7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAnastasia Payne / Holly Sherrer vs Yu-Ing Hargett / Tina McKelvey7-6, 6-3
2023-09-08vs Inverness CC - McClanahanWon 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Steed / Angie Blaising vs Melinda Claudepierre / Teague Wright7-5, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Holly Sherrer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.98
Beth English
published 4.5
3.97
Anastasia Payne
published 4
3.95
Tricia Golden
published
3.92
Angie Blaising
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.87
Tracy Strickland
published
3.87
Brynee Koretzky
published 4
3.78
Linda Sink
published
3.73
Karen Keene
published
3.72
Deanna Carroll
published 4
3.63
Ramona Cunningham
published
3.52
Leslie Housman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Holly Sherrer + Angie Blaising18860% games+4.5% vs expected
Ramona Cunningham + Linda Sink7452% games−2.1% vs expected
Linda Sink + Deanna Carroll314 matchesnot enough data
Anastasia Payne + Linda Sink303 matchesnot enough data
Anastasia Payne + Tracy Strickland123 matchesnot enough data
Beth English + Deanna Carroll303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Holly Sherrer
114W–50L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
4.05
4.5
Beth English
11W–4L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.98
4
Anastasia Payne
20W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
3.97
Tricia Golden
12W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.95
4
Angie Blaising
83W–56L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%72%27%
3.92
Tracy Strickland
22W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.87
4
Brynee Koretzky
10W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.87
Linda Sink
16W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
Karen Keene
28W–9L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Deanna Carroll
26W–9L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Ramona Cunningham
13W–9L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.63
Leslie Housman
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.