Teams

UPTA55C/Joffe/Thornblade

2024 UPTA Combo 55 & Over - SC · 55+ Combo Women - 6.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-08-28vs UPTA55C/Tassin/Keowee KeyLost 01
L#3 DoublesKaren Gallagher / Dana Saunders vs Mary Metzler / Laurie Sinkele3-6, 1-6
2024-08-21vs UPTA55C/Mccarthy/ReserveLost 01
L#3 DoublesKaren Gallagher / Amy Cupples vs Kathy Mendel / Sherry Morgan6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2024-08-07vs UPTA55C/Loyd/BrookstoneLost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Gallagher / Debbie Kiriakides vs Judith Morand / Therese Woorons2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55+ Combo Women - 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Angela Joffe
published 3.5
3.17
Pamela Finigan
published
3.07
Cathy Spitzmiller
published 3.5
3.05
Patty B Counihan
published
2.91
Sena Claxton
published
2.86
Carrie Dickert
published 3
2.85
Shelley Mckay
published
Karen Gallagher
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.72
2.67
Jane Miller
published
2.57
Amy Cupples
published 3
Nancy Robinson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Cupples + Cathy Spitzmiller4155% games+11.8% vs expected
Pamela Finigan + Angela Joffe3545% games+9.8% vs expected
Sena Claxton + Angela Joffe3548% games−0.2% vs expected
Sena Claxton + Patty B Counihan3642% games−9.2% vs expected
Pamela Finigan + Cathy Spitzmiller3249% gamesnot enough data
Amy Cupples + Debbie Kiriakides033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Angela Joffe
33W–36L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Pamela Finigan
18W–24L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Cathy Spitzmiller
15W–11L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
Patty B Counihan
5W–11L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.05
Sena Claxton
13W–34L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%23%
2.91
3
Carrie Dickert
9W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
2.86
Shelley Mckay
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Karen Gallagher
39W–108L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Debbie Kiriakides
9W–13L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.72
Jane Miller
27W–14L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Amy Cupples
16W–26L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
2.57
Nancy Robinson
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.