Teams

NWillis (Queens)

2025 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Women - Tues PM

8 players · average NTRP 4.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-15vs LClarke (Jeff Adams)Lost 01
L#3 SinglesAllison Bumgardner vs Lina Clarke3-6, 4-6
2025-07-08Won 10
W#3 SinglesAllison Bumgardner vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-01Won 10
W#2 SinglesMonica Erb vs Jennifer Krysinski6-0, 6-1
2025-06-24vs LClarke (Jeff Adams)Split 11
W#2 SinglesMeredith Sweeney vs Irma Laney6-4, 6-1
L#3 SinglesNicole Yudin vs Diana West2-6, 2-6
2025-06-17vs KCochran (Queens)Won 10
W#2 SinglesMeredith Sweeney vs Kim Cochran6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-10Won 10
W#3 SinglesNily Willis vs Megan Hunter6-2, 6-1
2025-06-03vs LClarke (Jeff Adams)Split 11
L#1 SinglesNicole Yudin vs Diana West3-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesNily Willis vs Irma Laney4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-06-01Won 10
W#1 SinglesMeredith Sweeney vs Claudia Bareis7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 4.5 Women - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Ella Bumgardner
published
4.10
Monica Erb
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.09
Nicole Yudin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.08
Allison Bumgardner
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.07
Meredith Sweeney
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.83
Elizabeth McCombs
published
3.79
Nily Willis
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
Emerson Mitchell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth McCombs + Nily Willis044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ella Bumgardner
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
4.31
4.5
Monica Erb
97W–77L career · 4 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Nicole Yudin
48W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
4.09
4.5
Allison Bumgardner
25W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
4.08
Meredith Sweeney
94W–52L career · 3 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
4.07
Elizabeth McCombs
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
3.83
4
Nily Willis
100W–79L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
Emerson Mitchell
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.