Teams

CRC - Browning

2024 · 2025 SATA USTA MXD 18 & Over - Winter

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings3 teams · 2025 SATA USTA MXD 18 & Over - Winter
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SATA/Sallie Tuten802139126
2CRC - Browning2681635230
3SCC - Bernstein2671736256

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Donny Lightsey
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.89
John Leone
published
2.88
Erik Bernstein
usually #3 Doubles 27%, also #1 Singles 27% · published 3
2.83
Jim Browning
published
2.83
Mairi Reynolds
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
2.72
Stacia Keith
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 24% · published
2.61
Hope Bernstein
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.58
Jan Nielsen
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
2.58
Sandi Idleman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.57
Brad Bryant
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.49
Zac Heywood
published
2.46
Patrick Gray
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.44
Nicole LaWare
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Lauren Dever
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ryan Betts
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Scott Idleman
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hope Bernstein + Erik Bernstein3541% games−3.6% vs expected
Stacia Keith + Scott Idleman1637% games−7.9% vs expected
Stacia Keith + Ryan Betts1539% gamesnot enough data
Jan Nielsen + Brad Bryant0518% gamesnot enough data
Sandi Idleman + Nicole LaWare134 matchesnot enough data
Sandi Idleman + Hope Bernstein134 matchesnot enough data
Donny Lightsey + Mairi Reynolds123 matchesnot enough data
Jan Nielsen + Sandi Idleman033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Donny Lightsey
12W–30L career · 14 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.94
John Leone
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
2.89
3
Erik Bernstein
24W–31L career · 14 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.88
Jim Browning
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.83
Mairi Reynolds
19W–19L career · 14 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
Stacia Keith
18W–32L career · 17 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Hope Bernstein
27W–36L career · 10 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.61
Jan Nielsen
11W–45L career · 7 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
Sandi Idleman
12W–24L career · 8 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
3
Brad Bryant
6W–37L career · 7 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57
Zac Heywood
1W–23L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.49
Patrick Gray
1W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.46
Nicole LaWare
15W–44L career · 15 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.44
Lauren Dever
6W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryan Betts
2W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Idleman
2W–16L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.