Teams

LJFernandez/PAC

2024 Lake USTA Tri Level Level 18 & Over · Men's Group B 3.0, 3.5 & 4.0 Thurs PM

10 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#2 DoublesIvan Ruyle / Jeffrey McCue vs Tim Bain / Carlos Freire2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-07-31vs TLVSA-Sampoornam/Bailey Tri BSplit 11
L#2 DoublesIvan Ruyle / Jeffrey McCue vs Steven Porter / Ben Holden0-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJoseph Spain / Bradford Powell vs Ranjith Rajadurai / Brad Hamilton6-3, 6-2
2024-07-11vs TLTVallejos/ Edgemoor Tri BLost 02
L#1 DoublesAndrew Howland / Joseph Spain vs Richard Fogel / Stan Martin7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJeffrey McCue / Pete Richards vs Dan Reinhart / Timothy Vallejos3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJeffrey McCue / Ivan Ruyle vs Carlos Freire / Andrew Orr1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-06-27vs TLJSC-Schrand/River Run Tri BWon 10
W#3 DoublesBradford Powell / Joseph Spain vs Ken Bush / Carson Anderson6-2, 6-2
2024-06-19vs LJLA-Lands/CSD Tri BLost 02
L#2 DoublesTodd Larsen / Jeffrey McCue vs Jason Lands / Michael Crutchfield6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBradford Powell / Joseph Spain vs Caleb OBriant / Greg Razewski6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's Group B 3.0, 3.5 & 4.0 Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Walter Ortiz
published
3.51
Todd Larsen
published
3.51
Ivan Ruyle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Julius Fernandez
published
3.46
Paul Thompson
published
3.36
Jeffrey McCue
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Joseph Spain
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.10
Andrew Howland
published 3.5
2.88
Bradford Powell
published 3
Walter Rodriguez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffrey McCue + Ivan Ruyle71247% games−0.2% vs expected
Julius Fernandez + Walter Ortiz404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Walter Ortiz
22W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%14%86%
3.65
Todd Larsen
20W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Ivan Ruyle
81W–69L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.51
Julius Fernandez
16W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
Paul Thompson
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Jeffrey McCue
70W–105L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.36
3
Joseph Spain
62W–38L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%21%79%
3.11
3.5
Andrew Howland
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
3
Bradford Powell
7W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%20%
2.88
Walter Rodriguez
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.