Teams

LOS GATOS SR CW6.5B

2025 COMBO · Women 6.5

25 players · average NTRP 3.14 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
W#2 DoublesPatrizia Fazeli / Jing Welch vs Paule Kodjou / Jenny Hubbert7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-09-14vs LOS ALTOS GCC CW6.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesKatherine Sandell / Jing Welch vs Janice Shapiro / Laura St Laurent7-5, 6-1
2025-09-12vs SUNNYVALE MTC CW6.5BWon 21
W#1 DoublesDana Knapp / Linda Panoutsos vs Guiting Ye / Shen Guan6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLauren Denevi / Jing Welch vs Runa Koizumi / Jingyao Yu4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesLorraine Mc Carthy / Lisa Baumert vs Anna An / Jingyi Zhang6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 24 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Lauren Denevi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Jing Welch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Lisa Baumert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Lorraine Mc Carthy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Charla Serbent
published 3.5
3.21
Jane Ensor
published
3.21
Dana Knapp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Amanda Holmquist
published 3.5
3.19
Mary Jo Lee
published
3.10
Barbara Westergren
published 3.5
3.00
Linda Panoutsos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Chengyu Chen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.97
Lauren Kutting
published
2.87
Audrey Patchett
published 3
2.84
Joan Culin
published
2.79
Janice Altknecht
published
2.78
Michelle Yoo
published
2.78
Katya Yanovich
published
2.76
Haik Russell
published 3
Ashley Pass
published 3
2.74
Frances Wu
published 2.5
2.70
Catherine Pham
published 3.5
2.54
Michele Stefan
published
2.45
Sara Rao
published
2.00
Andrea Peifer
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janice Altknecht + Linda Panoutsos2541% games−7.6% vs expected
Mary Jo Lee + Dana Knapp134 matchesnot enough data
Dana Knapp + Lisa Baumert314 matchesnot enough data
Haik Russell + Linda Panoutsos213 matchesnot enough data
Mary Jo Lee + Jane Ensor123 matchesnot enough data
Linda Panoutsos + Joan Culin213 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Denevi + Lisa Baumert303 matchesnot enough data
Lorraine Mc Carthy + Lisa Baumert213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Denevi
38W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.62
Jing Welch
18W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.45
Lisa Baumert
32W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.33
Lorraine Mc Carthy
12W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Charla Serbent
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.31
Jane Ensor
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Dana Knapp
13W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Amanda Holmquist
1W–17L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Mary Jo Lee
7W–25L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Barbara Westergren
4W–17L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.10
Linda Panoutsos
16W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.00
3
Chengyu Chen
16W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
Lauren Kutting
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Audrey Patchett
12W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
2.87
Joan Culin
18W–13L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.84
Janice Altknecht
3W–18L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
Michelle Yoo
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%5%
2.78
Katya Yanovich
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%2%98%
2.78
3
Haik Russell
15W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Ashley Pass
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Frances Wu
12W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%3%97%
2.74
3.5
Catherine Pham
21W–38L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.70
Michele Stefan
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%37%63%
2.54
Sara Rao
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%66%34%
2.45
2.5
Andrea Peifer
2W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.