Teams

MIL:MID COURT CRISIS:Orban/Cooper

2025 ECT Adult 18 & Over Women · 3.5 Women 1

19 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-02-22vs MAD:MadRackets:GoldfederWon 21
W#1 DoublesStefanie Kreiger / Samantha Cooper vs Michelle Belcourt / Alison Wehrle6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesWanling Zhu / Sarah du Plessis vs Patricia Goldfeder / Barbara Doran6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCarol Finnucan / Stacey Sager vs Krista Fay / Alison Randall1-6, 3-6
2025-01-26vs GF:Namaste at the Net:RosecransSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAnn Barham / Nadine Morandi vs Averi Cappetta / Kristen Rosecrans1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesStefanie Kreiger vs Laura LaCascia-Ehlert6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLynn Allen / MaryJo McGonagle vs Jill Fried / Eleanor Tandler3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesNelida Reyes-Matos / Daisy Qin vs Tracy Vanderbilt / Mary Glidden6-0, 6-3
2024-12-08vs TCT:3.5 Racquettes:BuschauerSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMia Bonadies / MaryJo McGonagle vs Supreeti Saikia / Liesl Purviance3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesStefanie Kreiger vs Kat Carangelo4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesWanling Zhu / Ann Barham vs Jenny Buschauer / Emily DeGrand3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSarah du Plessis / Jill Grego vs Vanessa Lee Rothkopf / Lisa Chang7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2024-11-24vs NHH:Fireballs:GershfeldLost 04
L#1 DoublesMia Bonadies / MaryJo McGonagle vs Heidi Brooks / Sheila Cimmino2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAllyson Moran vs Liz van Leer2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJill Grego / Monica Slowik vs Susan Griffiths / Wendy Feldman1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesStefanie Kreiger / Nelida Reyes-Matos vs Sandra Kennedy / Peg Oliveira5-7, 1-6
2024-10-26vs GF:Namaste at the Net:RosecransLost 13
W#1 DoublesSamantha Cooper / Allyson Moran vs Deborah Montenegro / Kate Piironen3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesStefanie Kreiger vs Maureen Goodrich0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesWanling Zhu / Nelida Reyes-Matos vs Leanne Jolin / Wendy Chicosky2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPaige Trevethan / Sarah du Plessis vs Kristen Rosecrans / Lori Moroso1-6, 2-6
2024-10-20vs MAD:MadRackets:GoldfederLost 04
L#1 DoublesNadine Morandi / Allyson Moran vs Jennifer Brant / Kathleen Speer2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesStefanie Kreiger vs Michelle Belcourt1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJess Noonan / Lynn Allen vs Marta Elmasry / Karen Aranow3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBetty Orban / Stacey Sager vs Andrea Bilskis / Dominique Ruddy1-6, 1-6
2024-10-06vs TCT:3.5 Racquettes:BuschauerWon 21
W#1 DoublesMia Bonadies / MaryJo McGonagle vs Liesl Purviance / ARLYNE THUNG6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWanling Zhu / Sarah du Plessis vs Supreeti Saikia / Sydnee Sousa6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCarol Finnucan / Monica Slowik vs Megan Patzelt / Deirdre Ronan5-7, 2-6
2024-09-29vs NHH:Fireballs:GershfeldLost 13
L#1 DoublesSamantha Cooper / Allyson Moran vs Susan Griffiths / Liz van Leer6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMia Bonadies vs Emily Ryder2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJess Noonan / Stacey Sager vs Carol Evans / Claudelle Natividad Le3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCarol Finnucan / Monica Slowik vs Amy Luisi / Lillian Garcia6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 3.5 Women 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NHH:Fireballs:Gershfeld0824721225
2OSRC:Diamond Dogs:Trausch/Libert0825721219
3MAD:MadRackets:Goldfeder08201025240
4LS:DeMatteo's Divas:DeMatteo08171533271
5OSRC:Prosecco girls:Goletz/Coffey08181434273
6TCT:3.5 Racquettes:Buschauer08141638314
7MIS:18 & over:Cosgriff/Raho08141840290
8GF:Namaste at the Net:Rosecrans0882347314
9MIL:MID COURT CRISIS:Orban/Cooper08112150347
10PV:18 & 3.5:Shanley0862656354

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Nadine Morandi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Stefanie Kreiger
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.15
MaryJo McGonagle
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.06
Jill Grego
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.95
Allyson Moran
usually #1 Doubles 82%, also #2 Doubles 9% · published 3
2.94
Wanling Zhu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Sarah du Plessis
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Monica Slowik
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Paige Trevethan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ann Barham
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Betty Orban
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Carol Finnucan
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Daisy Qin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.63
Stacey Sager
usually #3 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
2.63
Nelida Reyes-Matos
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jess Noonan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lynn Allen
published
Mia Bonadies
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Samantha Cooper
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wanling Zhu + Paige Trevethan1438% gamesnot enough data
Betty Orban + Stacey Sager134 matchesnot enough data
Nadine Morandi + Monica Slowik224 matchesnot enough data
Wanling Zhu + Sarah du Plessis314 matchesnot enough data
Paige Trevethan + Jill Grego134 matchesnot enough data
Wanling Zhu + Nelida Reyes-Matos033 matchesnot enough data
Stacey Sager + Carol Finnucan123 matchesnot enough data
Paige Trevethan + Sarah du Plessis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nadine Morandi
50W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Stefanie Kreiger
112W–103L career · 12 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.22
MaryJo McGonagle
5W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.15
Jill Grego
44W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
3
Allyson Moran
35W–27L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Wanling Zhu
46W–69L career · 4 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.94
Sarah du Plessis
39W–49L career · 9 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Monica Slowik
32W–41L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Paige Trevethan
42W–62L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Ann Barham
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Betty Orban
14W–36L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Carol Finnucan
48W–53L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Daisy Qin
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacey Sager
38W–49L career · 9 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
Nelida Reyes-Matos
31W–86L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
Jess Noonan
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lynn Allen
21W–43L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mia Bonadies
1W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Samantha Cooper
36W–16L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.