Teams

KTC Wenz

2024 OH OV SUMMER Combo · 7.5 Combo Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-21vs QRRC WebbLost 12
W#1 DoublesSamuel Garay / Cory Natoli vs Luke Hoban / Frank BUDDY Pitts Jr3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKerry Segebart / Todd Haines vs Rob Carpenter / Luke Trubee5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTyler Urse / JONATHAN FULTON vs Greg Haack / Jansen Meyers2-6, 4-6
2024-07-14vs STC SayerLost 12
L#1 DoublesSamuel Garay / Cory Natoli vs Brian Grant / Kane Feltner6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGeorge Thielen / Tyler Urse vs Christopher Kalweit / Kip Myers3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesTodd Haines / JONATHAN FULTON vs Chad Arnett / Tim Sayer6-3, 6-3
2024-06-30vs QRRC DadaianLost 03
L#1 DoublesTyler Urse / Kerry Segebart vs Michael Dadaian / Donovan Christman1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCory Natoli / Daryl Parks vs Aaron Wolters / Robert Hawley6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJONATHAN FULTON / Partha Banerjee vs Philip Vandeursen / Arthur Pharmer3-6, 4-6
2024-06-23vs STC SayerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSamuel Garay / Cory Natoli vs Alex Sarihan / Jacob Mozer6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesScott Arentsen / Daryl Parks vs Kevin Fraker / Bryan Ulery1-6, 3-6
2024-06-16vs QRRC WebbLost 03
L#1 DoublesSamuel Garay / Cory Natoli vs Rob Carpenter / Luke Trubee2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNathan Fullington / George Thielen vs Greg Haack / Jansen Meyers6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKevin Wimer / Daryl Parks vs Greg Toman / Kyle Webb3-6, 3-6
2024-06-09vs QRRC DadaianLost 02
L#1 DoublesSamuel Garay / Cory Natoli vs Donovan Christman / Shawn Mcneil3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKerry Segebart / Daryl Parks vs Dane Ranney / Arthur Pharmer6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-06-02vs STC SayerWon 21
W#1 DoublesSamuel Garay / Cory Natoli vs Jacob Mozer / Brian Grant7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDaryl Parks / George Thielen vs Bryan Ulery / Kevin Fraker6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJONATHAN FULTON / Kevin Wimer vs Tim Sayer / Nathan Kleptz1-6, 4-6
2024-05-19vs QRRC WebbLost 02
L#1 DoublesPatrick Gill / Daryl Parks vs Andrew Schulz / Clayton Burkle6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKevin Wimer / Todd Haines vs Jansen Meyers / Greg Haack2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.5 Combo Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1QRRC Webb8120718204
2QRRC Dadaian63171026233
3KTC Wenz2781939261

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Samuel Garay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Nathan Fullington
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.41
Todd Haines
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.38
Cory Natoli
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.31
Kerry Segebart
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Daryl Parks
usually #2 Doubles 78%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published 3.5
3.21
George Thielen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Patrick Gill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Kevin Wimer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Scott Arentsen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
JONATHAN FULTON
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Partha Banerjee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tom Wenz
published
Tyler Urse
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Wimer + JONATHAN FULTON14556% games+4.7% vs expected
Tom Wenz + George Thielen3538% games−2.6% vs expected
Partha Banerjee + Scott Arentsen11130% games−6.5% vs expected
Tom Wenz + Partha Banerjee0626% games−8.8% vs expected
Tom Wenz + Scott Arentsen0730% games−9.5% vs expected
Samuel Garay + Cory Natoli5452% gamesnot enough data
George Thielen + Tyler Urse4158% gamesnot enough data
George Thielen + Kerry Segebart1439% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Samuel Garay
37W–18L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
Nathan Fullington
48W–35L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Todd Haines
78W–42L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Cory Natoli
53W–35L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.38
Kerry Segebart
45W–54L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Daryl Parks
55W–107L career · 9 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
George Thielen
31W–39L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
Patrick Gill
50W–62L career · 2 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Kevin Wimer
43W–35L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Scott Arentsen
19W–59L career · 1 line in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.02
JONATHAN FULTON
32W–28L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
Partha Banerjee
10W–51L career · 1 line in 2024
9%89%1%
2.69
Tom Wenz
10W–57L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tyler Urse
25W–33L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.