Teams

RJampani (Blakeney)

2024 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 5.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-10-02vs JJZhu/ZMarenic (Jeff Adams)Won 10
W#3 DoublesPurnima Kunwor / Sandra Dickinson vs Maryann Whalen / Bailey Farrin3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-09-25vs AHall/RPlaisance (Raintree)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDiane DeMus / Maureen Polonus vs Rebecca Plaisance / Julie Klingman0-6, 2-6
2024-09-11vs MWolf/TAmos (WSRC)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesPurnima Kunwor / Sandra Dickinson vs Laurie Madonna / Victoria Sofarelli3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDiane DeMus / Kashmira Wankhedkar vs Pamela Trantham / Carron Flinter4-6, 0-6
2024-08-28vs JJZhu/ZMarenic (Jeff Adams)Split 11
L#1 DoublesLorena Giraldo / Diane DeMus vs Connie Arevalo / Zahide Marenic0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSandra Dickinson / Radhika Jampani vs Bailey Farrin / Maryann Whalen6-1, 6-0
2024-08-21vs AHall/RPlaisance (Raintree)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSandra Dickinson / Kashmira Wankhedkar vs Paula Abrams / Suzanne MacVicar1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.28 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.65
Sandra Dickinson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.64
Kinnera Angadi
published
2.52
Shikha Agrawal
published
2.51
Lorena Giraldo
published
2.34
Kashmira Wankhedkar
published
2.24
Radhika Jampani
published
2.09
Diane DeMus
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.00
Anne Talmage
published 2.5
1.99
Purnima Kunwor
published
1.85
Maureen Polonus
published
Alia Nassri
published
Betsy Sprenger
published
Mercedes Aycinena
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Radhika Jampani + Lorena Giraldo1538% games−0.6% vs expected
Radhika Jampani + Kinnera Angadi3247% gamesnot enough data
Diane DeMus + Maureen Polonus044 matchesnot enough data
Diane DeMus + Anne Talmage044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Sandra Dickinson
35W–44L career · 4 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
2.65
Kinnera Angadi
14W–10L career · no lines in 2024
0%13%87%
2.64
Shikha Agrawal
6W–15L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
2.52
Lorena Giraldo
9W–23L career · no lines in 2024
0%47%53%
2.51
Kashmira Wankhedkar
16W–18L career · no lines in 2024
0%90%10%
2.34
Radhika Jampani
13W–22L career · no lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.24
2.5
Diane DeMus
17W–75L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.09
2.5
Anne Talmage
4W–20L career · type S · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Purnima Kunwor
6W–18L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Maureen Polonus
1W–23L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.85
Alia Nassri
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Betsy Sprenger
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mercedes Aycinena
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.