Teams

SFV - Fuzz Off/Belcher

2025 Adult 18 SFV Spring · SFV 18 & Over - Women 4.5

18 players · average NTRP 4.54 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for SFV 18 & Over - Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.69
Mandi Collier
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 5
4.48
Yuri Nichelson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4.5
4.32
Wendy Lorentzen
usually #1 Singles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4.5
Carrie Gan
published 4.5
4.21
Christine Chen
published 4.5
4.17
Stella Ko
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
Shirley Fong
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.07
Roselle Paskus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.06
Mary Soto
published
4.04
Jennie Speciale
published
4.03
Alison Harma
published 4.5
4.02
Caridad Coto
published 4.5
3.95
Julie Flygare
published
3.94
Ami Belcher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.93
Ashley Kechter
published 4.5
3.76
Lauri Solano
published
3.72
Paula Evans
published
Loretta Peng
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ami Belcher + Shirley Fong3356% games+9.4% vs expected
Yuri Nichelson + Mandi Collier16861% games+8.4% vs expected
Lauri Solano + Paula Evans7453% games+2.0% vs expected
Mary Soto + Paula Evans033 matchesnot enough data
Jennie Speciale + Ashley Kechter033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Mandi Collier
188W–89L career · 7 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.69
4.5
Yuri Nichelson
206W–73L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
4.48
4.5
Wendy Lorentzen
81W–61L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Carrie Gan
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Christine Chen
12W–12L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.21
4.5
Stella Ko
85W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
4.17
4.5
Shirley Fong
89W–47L career · 5 lines in 2025
27%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Roselle Paskus
101W–105L career · 2 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
4.07
Mary Soto
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
4.06
Jennie Speciale
3W–13L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
4.04
4.5
Alison Harma
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
4.03
4.5
Caridad Coto
1W–14L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
4.02
Julie Flygare
17W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.95
4.5
Ami Belcher
60W–89L career · 2 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.94
4.5
Ashley Kechter
0W–11L career · no lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
3.93
Lauri Solano
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.76
Paula Evans
38W–21L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.72
Loretta Peng
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.