Teams

CLin (WSRC)

2025 Mixed Doubles 65 & Over League · 65 & Over Mixed 3.5 - Wed PM

7 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-29vs NChristensen (Southampton)Split 11
W#1 DoublesJeff Allcock / Diana Gasparro vs Phillip Morgan / Denise Bost6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAllen Ramsey / Michele Kelly vs MARK TERRIO / Sarah Terrio4-6, 5-7
2025-06-18vs NChristensen (Southampton)Won 20
W#1 DoublesChin Lin / Cyndie Hobson vs Dennis Davis / Denise Bost6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDiana Gasparro / Clarke Hobson vs David Hayes / Barbara Anne Romero7-5, 6-1
2025-06-11vs NChristensen (Southampton)Won 10
W#2 DoublesCyndie Hobson / Allen Ramsey vs Steve Hoyle / Barbara Anne Romero6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-06-04vs NChristensen (Southampton)Won 30
W#1 DoublesClarke Hobson / Michele Kelly vs Steve Hoyle / Barbara Anne Romero2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Bowman / Diana Gasparro vs Sarah Terrio / Giles Beal4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChin Lin / Cyndie Hobson vs MARK TERRIO / Denise Bost6-4, 7-5
2025-05-28vs NChristensen (Southampton)Won 20
W#2 DoublesDiana Gasparro / Chin Lin vs Lisa O'Shea / Phillip Morgan6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAllen Ramsey / Cyndie Hobson vs Nancy Christensen / Dennis Davis6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & Over Mixed 3.5 - Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Chin Lin
published 3.5
3.37
Diana Gasparro
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Cyndie Hobson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Jeff Allcock
published
3.26
Allen Ramsey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Clarke Hobson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Michele Kelly
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cyndie Hobson + Allen Ramsey3446% games−10.1% vs expected
Chin Lin + Diana Gasparro5257% gamesnot enough data
Cyndie Hobson + Clarke Hobson5074% gamesnot enough data
Cyndie Hobson + Chin Lin404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chin Lin
51W–28L career · no lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.54
3.5
Diana Gasparro
63W–59L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Cyndie Hobson
219W–123L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Jeff Allcock
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Allen Ramsey
16W–23L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3
Clarke Hobson
101W–50L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Michele Kelly
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.