Teams

GAC RED

2024 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 7.0 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-05-19vs PRKR REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesAva Katubig / Burt Katubig vs Jacqueline Hash / Mayank Saxena7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTracy Powers / Russell Stewart vs Srinivasa Nadendla / Sharan Swenski6-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesVincent Sica / Tracey Sica vs Melissa Wiseman / Seth White2-6, 1-6
2024-05-05vs SS-LT PURPLEWon 20
W#1 DoublesRussell Stewart / Tracy Powers vs Kristin Barber / Alex Mostrowski6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesVincent Sica / Tracey Sica vs Joyce Ziomek / Kyle Logan7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2024-04-21vs VCC REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAva Katubig / Burt Katubig vs Ashley Franklin / Jake Dosen6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTracy Powers / Russell Stewart vs Amy Goodman / Robert Goodman6-4, 6-4
2024-04-14vs PRC NAVYLost 02
L#2 DoublesBrooke Wagner / Jason Wagner vs Erin Jones / Jacob Stadelman7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesVincent Sica / Tracey Sica vs Donna Chan / DAVID DALESSANDRO5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 7.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Ava Katubig
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Brooke Wagner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.41
Russell Stewart
published
3.40
Kate Hanson
published
3.35
Tracey Sica
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Chad Ahrensdorf
published 3.5
3.24
3.21
Burt Katubig
published 3.5
3.11
Ann Baer
published 3.5
3.02
Tracy Powers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.01
Jason Wagner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brooke Wagner + Jason Wagner5453% games−1.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ava Katubig
43W–36L career · 2 lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.66
4
Brooke Wagner
180W–105L career · 1 line in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.55
Russell Stewart
51W–29L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%25%
3.41
Kate Hanson
25W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Tracey Sica
48W–28L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.35
3.5
Chad Ahrensdorf
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Alexander Sobolevsky
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Burt Katubig
9W–14L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Ann Baer
15W–16L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Tracy Powers
75W–74L career · 3 lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.02
Jason Wagner
27W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.