Teams

N OR-Lauritsen

2023 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Alena Lauritsen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Whitney Mam
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Rachel Emery
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 0
Results7 ties
2023-08-08Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDayna Jahnke-Corwin / Alena Lauritsen vs Robin Walker / Lauren Smith6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2023-08-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesWhitney Mam / JaReda Webb vs Jennifer Bifano / Rachael Seeger6-4, 6-1
2023-08-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesDayna Jahnke-Corwin / Alena Lauritsen vs Elena Buller / Kerstin Husbands6-3, 6-1
2023-08-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesRachel Emery / Alena Lauritsen vs Stephnie Bonn / Deanna McKay6-1, 6-2
2023-07-21Lost 01
L#1 DoublesWhitney Mam / Rachel Emery vs Rachael Seeger / Jacquelyn Miller7-6, 6-1
2023-07-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesWhitney Mam / JaReda Webb vs Carmen Timberlake / Nina Church-Adams6-0, 7-5
2023-06-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesDayna Jahnke-Corwin / Alena Lauritsen vs Lucila Griesser / Kerri Patrick6-4, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Alena Lauritsen
129W–74L career
0%67%33%
3.56
3.5
Whitney Mam
30W–27L career
not enough data
0
Rachel Emery
12W–7L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.