Teams

AHS Welch-CATS

2022 Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over Men · Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.90 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-06-04Split 11
W#1 DoublesMatthew Rosendale / Lorenzo Davis vs John Goodrich / Jeff Heatwole7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDerek Frazier / Dalin Pan vs Eric Wagner / Grant Watts4-6, 2-6
2022-06-01Won 10
W#2 DoublesLorenzo Davis / Melvin Herndon vs Michael Allen / Mark Owen5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-05-28vs Forest Lakes JorgensenSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLorenzo Davis / Melvin Herndon vs Benjamin Baker / Michael Cline3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesDalin Pan / Paul Schmidt vs Ben Jorgensen / Edward Lis6-4, 7-6
2022-05-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesMelvin Herndon / Lorenzo Davis vs John Goodrich / Steve Kimata6-2, 6-3
2022-05-07vs Forest Lakes JorgensenWon 10
W#1 DoublesLorenzo Davis / Melvin Herndon vs Michael Cline / Ben Jorgensen6-3, 6-2
2022-04-30vs BHSC MartinsenWon 20
W#1 DoublesMelvin Herndon / Lorenzo Davis vs Michael Allen / Will Sowers5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPaul Schmidt / Dalin Pan vs Richards Miller / Mark Owen7-5, 7-6
2022-04-23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLorenzo Davis / Melvin Herndon vs John Goodrich / Steve Kimata4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-04-16vs Forest Lakes JorgensenWon 10
W#1 DoublesLorenzo Davis / Melvin Herndon vs Kevin Riddle / Rene Roy6-4, 6-3
2022-04-09vs BHSC MartinsenWon 10
W#1 DoublesLorenzo Davis / Melvin Herndon vs Charles Friel / Richards Miller6-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Mark McCarron
published
3.87
Lorenzo Davis
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 4
Dalin Pan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Derek Frazier
published 4
3.74
Patrick Manalich
published
3.60
Melvin Herndon
published
3.56
Russell Ridings
published 4
3.22
Dave Contini
published 3.5
Matthew MacFarland
published
Peter Welch
published
Robert Emery
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark McCarron
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.98
4
Lorenzo Davis
113W–70L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Dalin Pan
25W–22L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Derek Frazier
13W–21L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
Patrick Manalich
8W–4L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Melvin Herndon
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Russell Ridings
76W–75L career · no lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Dave Contini
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
Matthew MacFarland
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Peter Welch
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robert Emery
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.