Teams

Burkwood Decker

2024 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo Weekend 8.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-07vs Avalon: Lancaster/LanghorneWon 10
W#3 DoublesKatherine Carnohan / Melissa Allen vs Nina Moore / Teresa Lancaster7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2024-08-24vs SCC- FranksWon 10
W#1 DoublesClaire Davis / Pamla Dietz vs Suzanne Spiller / Megan Shrestha7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2024-08-18vs Smitherton Oakies - BrothertonWon 10
W#1 DoublesAudrey Butterworth / Melissa Allen vs Kathryn Brotherton / Kelly Stalls6-3, 6-0
2024-08-13vs Westwood Terminetters - HauseLost 02
L#1 DoublesAudrey Butterworth / Melissa Allen vs Nellina Wooten / Lauren Jones7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKatherine Carnohan / Meredith White vs Bobbie Lou Oley / Ashley Schmitz4-6, 1-6
2024-08-11vs TCRC Morgan/GibsonWon 10
W#2 DoublesKatherine Carnohan / Meredith White vs Andrea Rahal / Johanna Farrell6-4, 6-1
2024-08-04vs Deep Run Loose StringsWon 10
W#1 DoublesPamla Dietz / Claire Davis vs Katherine McDowell / Carol Gregory7-6, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Weekend 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.11
4.52
Katherine Carnohan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.33
Ashley Hart
published 4.5
4.21
Erin Decker
published
4.07
Lindsey O'Kane
published
3.97
Susan Powell
published
3.91
Pamla Dietz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Courtney Booth
published 4
3.73
Jennifer Owens
published
3.65
Jordan McFee
published
3.57
Meredith White
published
3.44
Mary Davis
published
3.34
Melissa Allen
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Powell + Jennifer Owens10168% games+17.5% vs expected
Mary Davis + Ashley Hart4172% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Audrey Butterworth
13W–0L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
5.11
4.5
Katherine Carnohan
70W–52L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
4.52
4.5
Ashley Hart
21W–17L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
4.33
Erin Decker
14W–10L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.21
Lindsey O'Kane
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
4.07
Susan Powell
32W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Pamla Dietz
77W–39L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Courtney Booth
7W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
3.85
Jennifer Owens
29W–10L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Jordan McFee
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
Meredith White
7W–11L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.57
Mary Davis
17W–5L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.44
3.5
Melissa Allen
115W–116L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.