Teams

RCH Sims

2025 Adult 55 & Over-PB · Women 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-08vs Waddle/ RCH-PBWon 21
L#1 DoublesShana Lane / Shannon Pigott vs Camille Breland / Nancy Herrin1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRobin Hudson / Janet Patterson vs Helen Cartwright / Sally Hughes6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSonya Woodard / Nancy Gibson vs Druscilla Allen / Susan Pounds6-3, 6-2
2025-04-05vs Huddleston 3.5 55+Won 30
W#1 DoublesShana Lane / Wendy Carmichael vs Lisa Howell / Tricia Collier6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesRobin Hudson / Nancy Gibson vs Sharon Morgan / Diane Burnham7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesShannon Pigott / Janie Gilmore vs Donna Hand / Virginia Jackson6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-04-01vs Waddle/ RCH-PBWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanet Patterson / Robin Hudson vs Melinda Lucas / Gina McCarty6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMelissa McDaniel / Annette Foreman vs Nancy Herrin / Camille Breland1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMarcia Wright / Janie Gilmore vs Demaris Lee / Druscilla Allen2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-03-22vs Huddleston 3.5 55+Won 30
W#1 DoublesMelissa McDaniel / Sonya Woodard vs Amelia Huddleston / Sharon Morgan7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnnette Foreman / Shana Lane vs Diane Burnham / Virginia Jackson6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRobin Hudson / Audie Shook vs Donna Hand / Lisa Howell7-6, 6-2
2025-03-18vs Waddle/ RCH-PBLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnnette Foreman / Marcia Wright vs Camille Breland / Nancy Herrin3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSonya Woodard / Wendy Carmichael vs Druscilla Allen / Susan Pounds3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-03-08vs Huddleston 3.5 55+Won 21
W#1 DoublesRobin Hudson / Janet Patterson vs Judy Rutledge / Leigh Drummond6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesShannon Pigott / Janie Gilmore vs Amelia Huddleston / Sharon Morgan4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAudie Shook / Shana Lane vs Diane Burnham / Lisa Howell6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Audie Shook
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Sonya Woodard
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Robin Hudson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.10
Annette Foreman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Marcia Wright
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Janie Gilmore
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.95
Julie Sims
published
2.87
Shana Lane
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Janet Patterson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Shannon Pigott
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Wendy Carmichael
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janie Gilmore + Marcia Wright4252% games+4.8% vs expected
Audie Shook + Robin Hudson6157% games−2.9% vs expected
Janet Patterson + Robin Hudson303 matchesnot enough data
Annette Foreman + Shana Lane213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Audie Shook
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Sonya Woodard
21W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Robin Hudson
38W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.15
3.5
Annette Foreman
19W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Marcia Wright
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.07
Janie Gilmore
16W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.97
Julie Sims
6W–15L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.95
Shana Lane
15W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.87
Janet Patterson
17W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shannon Pigott
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wendy Carmichael
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.