Teams

AUBURTIN 40+

2023 USTA League Adult 40 & Over - Spring - HSV · 4.0 Men 40N2S3D

13 players · average NTRP 3.62 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-04-28vs Henderson 4.0 SpringLost 01
L#3 DoublesMichael Rogers / Thomas Hargrove vs Benjamin Weaver / Jeremy Pope3-6, 1-6
2023-04-18vs Henderson 4.0 SpringLost 01
L#3 DoublesEduardo DelaPaz / Thomas Hargrove vs Jeff Tate / Neil Matson2-6, 5-7
2023-04-10vs Kapil 4.0M40Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Rogers / Thomas Hargrove vs Douglas Counter / Greg Clark2-6, 3-6
2023-03-31vs Kapil 4.0M40Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Walker / Thomas Hargrove vs Tom Snoddy / Jon Scallan1-6, 2-6
2023-03-23Lost 01
L#2 SinglesThomas Hargrove vs Brian Lee1-6, 6-7
2023-03-20Lost 01
L#2 SinglesThomas Hargrove vs John Smith2-6, 2-6
2023-03-18vs Kapil 4.0M40Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Lee / Thomas Hargrove vs Tom Snoddy / Douglas Counter2-6, 3-6
2023-03-16vs Henderson 4.0 SpringLost 01
L#2 DoublesPeter Weiland / Thomas Hargrove vs Christopher Gainer / Gary Stephens1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men 40N2S3D have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
James Steele
published
3.58
Charles Abney
published 4
3.47
Abhijeet Shirgurkar
published 3.5
3.47
Pascal Auburtin
published
3.41
Paul Carothers
published
3.29
Eduardo DelaPaz
published
David Walker
published 3.5
3.21
Michael Rogers
published
3.16
Thomas Hargrove
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.13
Bono Wasistho
published 3.5
3.08
Tim Bishop
published
3.06
Peter Weiland
published
3.01
Sam Lin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Carothers + Tim Bishop11852% games−2.3% vs expected
James Steele + Charles Abney123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

James Steele
49W–53L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Charles Abney
22W–35L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
3.5
Abhijeet Shirgurkar
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.47
Pascal Auburtin
9W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.47
Paul Carothers
17W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.41
Eduardo DelaPaz
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
David Walker
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Rogers
13W–24L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
Thomas Hargrove
87W–114L career · 8 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Bono Wasistho
8W–20L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.13
Tim Bishop
13W–25L career · no lines in 2023
28%71%<1%
3.08
Peter Weiland
12W–45L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
Sam Lin
2W–10L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.