Teams

Lemmons/Bachman Day

2025 South East Tennis Combo 65 & over · Women 6.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-10-14vs Dodson DayLost 12
W#1 DoublesDonna Garner / Anne Ryals vs Susan Catalano / Janet Harbeck6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGeorgina Dillon / Linda Young vs Tami Hahn / Cindy Leighton2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPaula Bachman / Ginger Wessell vs Cynthia Lundy / Mary Jane Johnson1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-10-10vs Dodson DayWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Lemmons / Joyce Jordan vs Karen Foscue / Cynthia Lundy6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Holden / Sylvia Jones vs Linda Dodson / Susan Williams6-3, 6-1
2025-10-07vs Dodson DayLost 12
W#1 DoublesSylvia Jones / Karen Holden vs Mary Jane Johnson / Cindy Leighton7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLinda Young / Joyce Jordan vs Janet Harbeck / Susan Catalano3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesPaula Bachman / Sharon Sypniewski vs Tami Hahn / Cynthia Lundy3-6, 5-7
2025-10-02vs Dodson DayWon 21
L#1 DoublesGinger Wessell / Paula Bachman vs Susan Catalano / Janet Harbeck7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Holden / Sylvia Jones vs Barbara Nolan / Lynn Caputo6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDonna Garner / Georgina Dillon vs Christine Tryer / Cynthia Lundy6-2, 7-5
2025-09-25vs Dodson DayWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Lemmons / Joyce Jordan vs Susan Catalano / Janet Harbeck7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnne Ryals / Ginger Wessell vs Martha Pope / Tami Hahn6-2, 6-3
2025-09-19vs Dodson DayWon 20
W#1 DoublesDianne McKenna / Sylvia Jones vs Lynn Caputo / Barbara Nolan7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGeorgina Dillon / Linda Young vs Martha Pope / Cynthia Lundy6-2, 6-0
2025-09-11vs Dodson DayWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Lemmons / Joyce Jordan vs Cindy Leighton / Karen Foscue6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPaula Bachman / Ginger Wessell vs Cynthia Lundy / Christine Tryer6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRobyn Mann / Joan Cozza vs Linda Dodson / Patricia Breyfogle6-2, 6-0
2025-09-05vs Dodson DayWon 30
W#1 DoublesRobyn Mann / Linda Young vs Janet Harbeck / Cindy Leighton6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDianne McKenna / Sylvia Jones vs Lynn Caputo / Barbara Nolan6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAnne Ryals / Sharon Sypniewski vs Tami Hahn / Patricia Breyfogle6-2, 7-6
2025-09-02vs Dodson DayWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Lemmons / Joyce Jordan vs Tami Hahn / Cindy Leighton6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPaula Bachman / Linda Young vs Mary Jane Johnson / Cynthia Lundy6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRobyn Mann / Sharon Sypniewski vs Susan Catalano / Janet Harbeck3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Joyce Jordan
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published
Dianne McKenna
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Joan Cozza
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Paula Bachman
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
3.21
Anne Ryals
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.20
Susan Lemmons
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Sylvia Jones
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.94
Robyn Mann
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Sharon Sypniewski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Linda Young
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.84
Georgina Dillon
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.81
Ginger Wessell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paula Bachman + Joyce Jordan7653% games+12.1% vs expected
Susan Lemmons + Joyce Jordan4170% gamesnot enough data
Paula Bachman + Anne Ryals134 matchesnot enough data
Paula Bachman + Ginger Wessell123 matchesnot enough data
Anne Ryals + Joyce Jordan213 matchesnot enough data
Joan Cozza + Sylvia Jones303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joyce Jordan
26W–21L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Dianne McKenna
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joan Cozza
16W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
Paula Bachman
11W–17L career · 9 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Anne Ryals
24W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.21
Susan Lemmons
18W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Sylvia Jones
20W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.11
Robyn Mann
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.94
Sharon Sypniewski
9W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
2.88
Linda Young
6W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
2.86
3.5
Georgina Dillon
2W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
2.84
3
Ginger Wessell
18W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.