Teams

SRTC-Forster

2026 OH OV SUMMER Combo · 5.5 Combo Women

16 players · average NTRP 2.83 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-23vs BCC-TrotterWon 10
W#2 DoublesFranziska Williamson / Lois Wood vs Lynette Jacques / Julie Trotter6-4, 7-5
2026-07-12vs KTC-WaitLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Holbrook / Liz Smith vs Montana Wait / Jeanna Stecklein3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Franklin / Jane Woodford vs Nicole Armitage / Vicky Berry4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLynn Watkins / Rebecca Reeves vs Lauren Mason / Mallory Jahn2-6, 6-7
2026-06-21vs BCC-TrotterWon 21
L#1 DoublesMelissa Doherty / Melinda Burton vs Julia Taylor / Christine Naberhaus6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesArshia Myers / Jane Woodford vs Katie Ruef / Julie Trotter6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRebecca Reeves / Connie Davenport vs Joyce Hayden / Jordan Peasant3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-31vs KTC-WaitWon 21
W#1 DoublesLinda Zimmer / Liz Smith vs Montana Wait / Jeanna Stecklein6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesConnie Davenport / Jane Woodford vs Virginia Dowse / Jana Kwik2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKrista Mitchell / Katie Humphreville vs Nicole Armitage / Tara Viney6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Combo Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.48 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Katie Humphreville
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.99
Melinda Burton
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.98
Arshia Myers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.78
Lynn Watkins
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.71
Lois Wood
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Bonnie Grieco
published 3
2.56
Susan Holbrook
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.43
Hanna Hulbert
published
2.30
Pat Forster
published
2.29
Krista Mitchell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.27
Jane Woodford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.03
Connie Davenport
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.02
Melissa Doherty
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.78
Franziska Williamson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Linda Zimmer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Maureen Murphy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Humphreville + Melinda Burton6172% games+29.7% vs expected
Lynn Watkins + Katie Humphreville10169% games+13.3% vs expected
Pat Forster + Bonnie Grieco261656% games+8.9% vs expected
Arshia Myers + Katie Humphreville4452% games+5.1% vs expected
Lynn Watkins + Melinda Burton2450% games+3.3% vs expected
Franziska Williamson + Connie Davenport0932% games−7.8% vs expected
Melinda Burton + Melissa Doherty2549% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Watkins + Arshia Myers2351% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Humphreville
61W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
Melinda Burton
66W–57L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Arshia Myers
44W–42L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
Lynn Watkins
72W–50L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
2.78
Lois Wood
29W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Bonnie Grieco
29W–16L career · no lines in 2026
14%86%1%
2.65
Susan Holbrook
47W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
0%33%67%
2.56
Hanna Hulbert
36W–27L career · no lines in 2026
0%70%30%
2.43
Pat Forster
36W–37L career · no lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.30
Krista Mitchell
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
0%93%7%
2.29
Jane Woodford
10W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Connie Davenport
21W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03
Melissa Doherty
6W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Franziska Williamson
10W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.78
Linda Zimmer
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Maureen Murphy
1W–29L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.