Teams

Harmon - Spin Doctors

2025 Charlottesville Singles · Charlottesville Singles 4.5 Men

5 players · average NTRP 4.33 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-10-27vs Shahane - KeswickWon 21
W#1 SinglesDamian Doyle vs Scott Bohmke6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAaron Streit vs Amit Shahane6-3, 2-3
L#3 SinglesDavid Harmon vs Jay Reeves6-7, 0-6
2025-10-13vs Schartz - BHSC WarhogsLost 12
L#1 SinglesDamian Doyle vs Cristian Ferrer2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAaron Streit vs Todd Sechser6-7, 5-7
W#3 SinglesMark Illgner vs Brandon Schartz6-7, 3-2
2025-10-09vs Shahane - KeswickSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMark Illgner vs Scott Bohmke6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 SinglesDamian Doyle vs Sean Mullins6-1, 6-2
2025-10-06vs Dellimore - ACAC AcesLost 12
L#1 SinglesDavid Harmon vs Chris Stambaugh2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesAaron Streit vs Harris Haynie6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesDamian Doyle vs JOSEPH MATHERS3-6, 3-6
2025-10-02vs Schartz - BHSC WarhogsLost 02
L#2 SinglesAaron Streit vs Andrew Juge7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesMark Illgner vs Reid Phillips1-6, 4-6
2025-09-15vs Dellimore - ACAC AcesSplit 11
L#2 SinglesAaron Streit vs Ruoyu Zhang4-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesDamian Doyle vs Chike Dellimore7-5, 6-3
2025-09-08vs Schartz - BHSC WarhogsLost 03
L#1 SinglesAaron Streit vs Todd Sechser0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesDavid Harmon vs Robert Cueva1-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesRushman Andrews vs Brandon Schartz6-7, 1-6
2025-09-04vs Shahane - KeswickWon 20
W#1 SinglesMark Illgner vs Amit Shahane6-4, 6-4
W#3 SinglesDamian Doyle vs Greg Benham6-2, 6-1
2025-08-28vs Dellimore - ACAC AcesLost 03
L#1 SinglesAaron Streit vs Ruoyu Zhang4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesDamian Doyle vs Ramzi Talhouk6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesDavid Harmon vs Harris Haynie4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Singles 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.19 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Mark Illgner
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.26
Aaron Streit
usually #2 Singles 71%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 4.5
Damian Doyle
usually #3 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 4.5
4.14
David Harmon
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
4.00
Rushman Andrews
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark Illgner
6W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
4.36
4.5
Aaron Streit
5W–10L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
4.26
4.5
Damian Doyle
4W–3L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
David Harmon
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
4.14
Rushman Andrews
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%49%51%
4.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.